Titlebook: Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934; Carsten Jensen,Finn Aaserud,Helge Kragh,Roger H. S Book 2000 Springer Basel AG 20

Fillmore

書目名稱Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934被引頻次




書目名稱Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934年度引用




書目名稱Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934讀者反饋




書目名稱Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

火海

完全

隨意

1421-6329 l years at the Niels Bohr Institute; to Relge, he was a welcome resource for personal and intellectual interac- tion in an otherwise less than fertile environment for the history of science; Roger was Carsten‘s friend and advisor, not least in the development of the dissertation on which the present

amphibian

出處

978-3-0348-9569-9Springer Basel AG 2000

出處

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1323-9inor interest. “I have often pointed out,” he wrote in 1906, “what an important part the α particle plays in radioactive transformation. In comparison the . and . rays play quite a secondary role.” . His attitude changed around 1911, however, and for some years Rutherford placed an essential part of

合唱團(tuán)

SEED

Type-1-Diabetes

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1748-0 disintegrations with artificially accelerated protons were made.. These events stimulated a dramatic increase in the number of publications and Ph.D. degrees awarded in nuclear physics, and the possibility for raising funds for nuclear research was much improved..