Titlebook: Controversies in Latin American Bioethics; Eduardo Rivera-López,Martin Hevia Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 sexual and repr

難受

書(shū)目名稱Controversies in Latin American Bioethics影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Controversies in Latin American Bioethics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Controversies in Latin American Bioethics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Controversies in Latin American Bioethics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Controversies in Latin American Bioethics被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Controversies in Latin American Bioethics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Controversies in Latin American Bioethics年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Controversies in Latin American Bioethics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Controversies in Latin American Bioethics讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Controversies in Latin American Bioethics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

anarchist

Cholesterol

內(nèi)疚

The Legal Status of Surrogacy in Latin Americaa that surrogacy corrupts maternity; “child welfare concerns,” that is, the idea that surrogacy should not be allowed because of its effects on resulting children; and the potential exploitation of surrogates. The author of this article concludes that these objections are not convincing but that the

會(huì)犯錯(cuò)誤

Innovative Care in Latin America: Definition, Justification and Ethical Principlest chapter scrutinizes this nascent field of inquiry in Latin America and offers a conceptual framework for innovation as well as its ethical justification. As we will argue, an important use of the term “innovation” or “innovative care” is best interpreted as “new non-validated practice” and not as

Militia

Ethics in Conducting and Communicating Research: A Brazilian Perspectiveresults being funded or produced under their auspices are reliable. In this article, we make an incursion into the process of production of technological knowledge—through the stages of financing, production itself, and dissemination—in an effort to identify the factors that can lead to misconduct.

Militia

Inculcate

Reazioni psicologiche alle malattie at risk. However, according to those with a conservative view on abortion, none of this justifies the intentional killing of an embryo, which they take as a person with a right to life. I argue that there are no good arguments in favor of considering an embryo to be a person since on all accounts,

集合

背景

Introduzione ,. Nel backstage di una scheda,a that surrogacy corrupts maternity; “child welfare concerns,” that is, the idea that surrogacy should not be allowed because of its effects on resulting children; and the potential exploitation of surrogates. The author of this article concludes that these objections are not convincing but that the