找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Contextualism, Factivity and Closure; A Union That Should Stefano Leardi,Nicla Vassallo Book 2018 The Author(s), under exclusive license t

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Magnanimous
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 05:23:49 | 只看該作者
Peter Ritz,Peter Marti,Bruno Thürlimannended version turns out to entail a radical revision of factivity that seems extremely unpalatable. The minimalistic version of contextualism, on the other hand, seems to be rather unappealing due to its non-Moorean nature.
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 08:11:04 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 12:23:03 | 只看該作者
Book 2018xtualism, an important innovation in contemporary epistemology, enabling readers to gain a better understanding of the various solutions to the factivity problem. As the authors demonstrate, each explanation is based on a different interpretation of the problem.??.Divided into seven chapters, the bo
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 19:29:39 | 只看該作者
Institut für Baustatik. Versuchsberichte the context of the knowledge attributor. According to a recent objection labelled “the factivity problem”, contextualism, if combined with the principle of factivity and with the principle of closure, would turn out to be an inconsistent theory. In this chapter are presented the contextualist stanc
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 23:46:18 | 只看該作者
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 00:37:31 | 只看該作者
Hansruedi Ganz,Bruno Thürlimannio knows. that Oliver knows. that .”, holds. Here we will scrutinize two different solutions that propose to reconsider the role of this kind of ascriptions. The first is due to Brueckner and Buford and maintains that asymmetrical knowledge ascriptions should be refuted; the contextualists would not
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 04:30:30 | 只看該作者
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 11:46:58 | 只看該作者
Peter Ritz,Peter Marti,Bruno Thürlimann factivity problem, have to be rephrased to account for the contextualist understanding of the semantics of “know”. It could be wondered, therefore, if other principles that might tacitly play a role in the argument of the conundrum need a similar treatment. In this chapter we will try to reply to t
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 16:06:58 | 只看該作者
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 18:02:56 | 只看該作者
Stefano Leardi,Nicla VassalloAnalyzes an inconsistency within epistemic contextualism known as the factivity problem.Details different solutions to the factivity problem developed by key philosophers.Identifies three main approac
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-25 14:46
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
阿图什市| 林周县| 武安市| 乐清市| 凤山市| 绥阳县| 呼和浩特市| 林芝县| 将乐县| 宿松县| 建昌县| 类乌齐县| 莆田市| 镇沅| 凤台县| 根河市| 浦县| 霍山县| 当雄县| 巴南区| 通化市| 康乐县| 罗源县| 惠来县| 盘山县| 梁平县| 枞阳县| 大石桥市| 石泉县| 青河县| 曲麻莱县| 贵港市| 双流县| 长春市| 东辽县| 阿拉善盟| 德昌县| 监利县| 平湖市| 华安县| 梁山县|