Titlebook: Content and Consciousness Revisited; With Replies by Dani Carlos Mu?oz-Suárez,Felipe De Brigard Book 2015 Springer International Publishing

沒(méi)血色

,A Most Rare Achievement: Dennett’s Scientific Discovery in ,, argues that in that book Dennett reported a scientifically significant discovery about what minds are. This initially seems implausible, because at first sight . presents as an exercise in pure philosophical analysis of everyday discourse about the mental, and that is a profoundly unlikely method f

grandiose

,What Was I Thinking? Dennett’s , and the Reality of Propositional Attitudes,ver, as I argue in this paper, both sides of this debate agreed on a basic assumption: that the truth (or falsehood) of our ascription of propositional attitudes has direct ontological implications four our theories about their nature. In the current paper I argue that such an assumption is false, a

JAUNT

身心疲憊

憂傷

,Dennett’s Personal/Subpersonal Distinction in the Light of Cognitive Neuropsychiatry,ier and a later one. My aim is to clarify both versions of the distinction and examine them in the light of a particular enterprise, namely cognitive neuropsychiatry. In particular, the two versions of the distinction cast delusional subjects in very different lights. According to the later distinct

陰謀小團(tuán)體

I Am Large, I Contain Multitudes: The Personal, the Sub-personal, and the Extended,e starts and dead ends, Dennett warns, especially when it comes to the areas of thinking and reasoning. Why is the distinction important? To what extent have cognitive scientists and philosophers honored this distinction? This paper will use the current debate over the extended mind hypothesis – rou

令人悲傷

Learning Our Way to Intelligence: Reflections on Dennett and Appropriateness, call the intelligent storage of information”. This statement amounts to a claim that learning functions as the criterion of intelligence, or, at least, the criterion for the intelligent storage of information. It is this connection between learning and intelligence that I defend in this essay. I be

panorama

The Intentional Stance and Cultural Learning: A Developmental Feedback Loop, an objection to Dennett’s intentional stance theory (i.e. the ‘If it isn’t true, why does it work?’ objection). Specifically, young children’s use of the intentional stance enables them to learn from and thereby to become more similar to the adults in their culture. As a result, they themselves bec