Titlebook: Contact Dermatitis; Jeanne Duus Johansen,Vera Mahler,Peter J. Frosch Living reference work 20200th edition cutaneous toxicology.exposure

改進(jìn)

Skin Tests for Immediate Hypersensitivity, to bear in mind that the tests measure sensitization and not clinical disease. Most widely used are skin prick tests (SPT), whereas intracutaneous (intradermal) testing (ICT) should be restricted to cases where skin prick testing is negative and only performed with sterile material. Any soluble all

披肩

ENDOW

Expostulate

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36336-9mical methods, the purity of a substance can be checked and new allergens can be isolated and identified. Advanced methods such as mass spectrometry (MS), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), and infrared spectrophotometry (IR) are often required to identify isolated allergens.

parallelism

得體

Clinical Aspects of Irritant Contact Dermatitis,tive equipment, organizational, or technical measures. Some topical medications and skin care products may cause subjective discomfort (“stinging”) without clinical signs of irritation. This is considered to be a special form of neurosensory irritation.

Antagonism

intrude

Historical Aspects of Contact Dermatitis,g of international working groups and societies, such as the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG), the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG), the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group (EECDRG), and the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD).

onlooker

Histopathological and Immunohistopathological Features of Irritant and Allergic Contact Dermatitis,is), depending on the nature and/or concentration of irritant chemicals and the reactivity of the skin. New immunocytopathological techniques are of no help in distinguishing between irritant and allergic patch test reactions, since there is little evidence of differential cytokine release.

為寵愛(ài)