找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Constructivism in Science Education; A Philosophical Exam Michael R. Matthews Book 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998 cons

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 34819|回復(fù): 51
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:21:04 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education
副標(biāo)題A Philosophical Exam
編輯Michael R. Matthews
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/237/236139/236139.mp4
圖書封面Titlebook: Constructivism in Science Education; A Philosophical Exam Michael R. Matthews Book 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998 cons
描述Constructivism is one of the most influential theories incontemporary education and learning theory. It has had great influencein science education. The papers in this collection represent,arguably, the most sustained examination of the theoretical andphilosophical foundations of constructivism yet published. .Topics covered include: orthodox epistemology and the philosophicaltraditions of constructivism; the relationship of epistemology tolearning theory; the connection between philosophy and pedagogy inconstructivist practice; the difference between radical and socialconstructivism, and an appraisal of their epistemology; the strengthsand weaknesses of the Strong Programme in the sociology of science andimplications for science education. The book contains an extensivebibliography. .Contributors include philosophers of science, philosophers ofeducation, science educators, and cognitive scientists. The book isnoteworthy for bringing this diverse range of disciplines together inthe examination of a central educational topic.
出版日期Book 1998
關(guān)鍵詞constructivism; education; objectivity; science; science education; sociology
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5032-3
isbn_softcover978-0-7923-4924-2
isbn_ebook978-94-011-5032-3
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education被引頻次




書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education年度引用




書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education讀者反饋




書目名稱Constructivism in Science Education讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:24:04 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:23:09 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:51:25 | 只看該作者
Jürgen Hampel,Andreas Klinke,Ortwin Renne concepts, positions and arguments for the latter than is immediately available in the paper. Part II discusses the problem of intersubjectivity in constructivism. The general conclusions drawn from these sections is that the basic concepts and theses of constructivism are, mostly, at best very obs
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:30:00 | 只看該作者
Robert Backhaus,Gerald Braun,Stefan Weiersply confused, should be devastated, if not silenced for ever. But the circumstances in the case at hand are not ordinary. W. A. Suchting calls his effort . and within the first six pages he provides an instructive example of his very own method of deconstruction. Though the traditional philosopher’s
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:31:33 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:15:42 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:35:23 | 只看該作者
Analyse der Unternehmenspotenziale,c knowledge. This paper offers a critical examination of some of the basic claims of this branch of science studies and argues that social constructivists cannot explain some of the most characteristic features of the physical sciences. The implications of social constructivism for science education
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:48:21 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:07:19 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55893-1upon the rationale and practice of science teaching. It is maintained that if the claims of SSK are true then there are serious, and educationally and culturally deleterious, implications which follow. The two articles will argue that, fortunately, the claims of SSK for the external causation of sci
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-31 17:25
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
苗栗市| 阳信县| 常熟市| 梁河县| 梨树县| 庐江县| 章丘市| 屯留县| 九寨沟县| 怀远县| 渭源县| 临桂县| 柏乡县| 咸宁市| 中超| 明溪县| 台江县| 大埔区| 磐石市| 莱西市| 会东县| 西吉县| 马鞍山市| 精河县| 昌平区| 远安县| 炉霍县| 吉木乃县| 绥芬河市| 罗山县| 桃源县| 若尔盖县| 云阳县| 曲麻莱县| 闻喜县| 肃宁县| 奈曼旗| 岑巩县| 武宣县| 香港| 辽阳市|