找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Constitutional Debates, Rhetoric, and Political Philosophy in Spain’s Parliamentary History; Francisco J. Bellido Book 2024 The Editor(s)

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Stenosis
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 00:41:38 | 只看該作者
Liberalism and Democracy in Contemporary Spain,onal state. First, it presents the main features of constitutional liberalism during the nineteenth and the twentieth centuries. Second, it explores the Portuguese, the Greek, and the Spanish transitions to democracy to appraise their most salient aspects, essential to understand the foundations of
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 04:05:17 | 只看該作者
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 07:55:14 | 只看該作者
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 10:19:07 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 16:08:06 | 只看該作者
Wyclife Ong’eta Mose,Giuseppe T. Cirella. Political concepts such as ‘nation’, ‘constitution’, ‘sovereignty’, ‘representation’, ‘constituent power’, and ‘freedom’ had partly new meanings that reflected the success of liberal ideas. Constitution, parliamentary representation, and freedoms became the bedrock of the revamped language of libe
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 20:10:42 | 只看該作者
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 01:56:21 | 只看該作者
Wyclife Ong’eta Mose,Giuseppe T. Cirella931 and the autonomist state of 1978 were designed in connection to scholarly disagreements about the advantages and flaws of centralism and federalism. Each of these designs was formulated as an alternative to the full decentralization of state competences. Concepts such as ‘competences’, ‘facultie
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 04:35:47 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 08:14:40 | 只看該作者
Search Engine Optimization (SEO),Three aspects are of special relevance in that regard. First, popular and national sovereignty were presented as synonyms even though the Constitution only enshrined national sovereignty. Second, centrist and right-wing representatives accepted the rule of law as mainstay of democratic institutions
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 12:37:59 | 只看該作者
Search Engine Advertising (SEA),the constituent assembly of 1977–1978. In the first part, the conflicting understandings of regional autonomy as self-rule are discussed. In the second part, disagreements around the concept of ‘nationalities’ are surveyed to understand why that concept was eminently controversial. In the third part
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-11 14:53
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
福安市| 双城市| 宁陵县| 元阳县| 南阳市| 西畴县| 平定县| 奉化市| 宜兰县| 边坝县| 沈丘县| 江北区| 新平| 甘孜| 香港| 海阳市| 丁青县| 固始县| 昆山市| 晋州市| 云南省| 博白县| 郯城县| 神池县| 邵阳市| 喀喇沁旗| 水城县| 平陆县| 桐城市| 兰州市| 顺昌县| 阆中市| 嘉善县| 华容县| 富平县| 正镶白旗| 大方县| 江华| 呼玛县| 汝阳县| 平乐县|