找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts; Reframing Participat Emanuela Saporito Book 2016 The Author(s) 2016 Conflict Resolution

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 53362|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:52:56 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts
副標(biāo)題Reframing Participat
編輯Emanuela Saporito
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/236/235712/235712.mp4
概述Compares three principal theoretical models of participation in urban planning processes.Presents a case study, the Integrated Intervention Program PII Isola Lunetta in Milan, to investigate model per
叢書(shū)名稱SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts; Reframing Participat Emanuela Saporito Book 2016 The Author(s) 2016 Conflict Resolution
描述This book aims to identify ways of overcoming the limitations of the communicative tradition in understanding participatory spatial planning. Three conceptual models that offer different perspectives on public and civic participation in complex urban planning processes are presented and reviewed: the consensual model, which conceives of planning as a collective decision-making practice geared toward consensus building and conflict resolution; the conflictual model, which views planning as a social mobilization practice addressed at empowerment of marginalized groups; and the trading zone model, which reframes collaborative planning as a coordination activity with respect to practical proposals in the presence of unstable and conflicting rationalities and values. The controversial story of the Integrated Intervention Program “PII Isola Lunetta” in Milan is examined through the interpretative lenses of these models, with detailed interpretation of how each model performs in the field. The book concludes by offering critical reflections on the reframing of participatory spatial planning, highlighting the value of trading zones/trading languages and boundary objects as tools for unders
出版日期Book 2016
關(guān)鍵詞Conflict Resolution; Consensual Model; Participatory Spatial Planning; Trading Zone Model; Trading Zones
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30829-6
isbn_softcover978-3-319-30827-2
isbn_ebook978-3-319-30829-6Series ISSN 2191-530X Series E-ISSN 2191-5318
issn_series 2191-530X
copyrightThe Author(s) 2016
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:33:41 | 只看該作者
2191-530X field. The book concludes by offering critical reflections on the reframing of participatory spatial planning, highlighting the value of trading zones/trading languages and boundary objects as tools for unders978-3-319-30827-2978-3-319-30829-6Series ISSN 2191-530X Series E-ISSN 2191-5318
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:11:52 | 只看該作者
Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable ConflictsReframing Participat
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:32:30 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:34:24 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:09:26 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:17:35 | 只看該作者
Rationalities at Work: How to Read the PII Isola Participatory Process Through Three Different Conceach of the three interpretative groups of theories explored in Chap.?. performs when applied to collaborative planning practices as interpretative lenses of a complex reality, and consequently how these three theoretical approaches differ from each other or even are interdependent.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:33:46 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:15:15 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:06:11 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 21:24
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
礼泉县| 元江| 栾川县| 招远市| 滦平县| 横山县| 武宣县| 崇信县| 白朗县| 策勒县| 筠连县| 晴隆县| 普安县| 正阳县| 武冈市| 横峰县| 冀州市| 区。| 宁乡县| 宣城市| 突泉县| 霍城县| 庆元县| 海原县| 珲春市| 历史| 江阴市| 江达县| 阳谷县| 中西区| 杭锦后旗| 新营市| 林西县| 怀集县| 平凉市| 垫江县| 宝坻区| 含山县| 砚山县| 额济纳旗| 余干县|