找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Condorcet‘s Paradox; William V. Gehrlein Book 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006 Concorcet‘s Paradox.Condorcet.Election Procedure

[復制鏈接]
查看: 55554|回復: 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:50:51 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Condorcet‘s Paradox
編輯William V. Gehrlein
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/236/235228/235228.mp4
概述Exclusively dedicated to Condorcet‘s Paradox and to the various approaches developed to study this phenomenon.Comprehensive compilation of the research conducted on Condorcet‘s Paradox for two centuri
叢書名稱Theory and Decision Library C
圖書封面Titlebook: Condorcet‘s Paradox;  William V. Gehrlein Book 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006 Concorcet‘s Paradox.Condorcet.Election Procedure
描述Condorcet’s Paradox has been formally studied by an amazing number of people in many different contexts for more than two centuries. Peter Fishburn introduced the basic notion of the Paradox to me in 1971 during a course in Social Choice Theory at Pennsylvania State University. My immediate response to seeing the simple example that he presented was that this phenomenon certainly could not be very likely to ever be observed in reality. Peter quickly suggested that I should work on developing some representations for the probability that the Paradox might occur, and very soon thereafter that pursuit began. It is only after 35 years of effort, with a lot of help from Peter, that I now feel that a good answer can be given to the challenge that was presented in that classroom in 1971. Many people have suggested to me over the years that a book like this should be completed, since the source material is spread over such a wide variety of disciplines of a- demic journals and books that it is very difficult for people to know what has been done, and has not been done, in this area of determining representations for the probability that Condorcet’s Paradox would ever be observed in reality
出版日期Book 2006
關(guān)鍵詞Concorcet‘s Paradox; Condorcet; Election Procedures; Voting; Voting Paradoxes; social choice
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33799-7
isbn_softcover978-3-642-07035-8
isbn_ebook978-3-540-33799-7Series ISSN 0924-6126 Series E-ISSN 2194-3044
issn_series 0924-6126
copyrightSpringer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Condorcet‘s Paradox影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Condorcet‘s Paradox影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Condorcet‘s Paradox網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Condorcet‘s Paradox網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Condorcet‘s Paradox被引頻次




書目名稱Condorcet‘s Paradox被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Condorcet‘s Paradox年度引用




書目名稱Condorcet‘s Paradox年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Condorcet‘s Paradox讀者反饋




書目名稱Condorcet‘s Paradox讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:19:37 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:59:34 | 只看該作者
The Impact of Societal Factors,d in this context is the degree of coherence or consistency of voters’ preferences, as measured according to some definition of social homogeneity. Numerous studies have sought to find general relationships between these measures of social homogeneity and the probability that a PMRW exists. Some the
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:22:41 | 只看該作者
The Impact of Coherent Preferences,e-troughedness, or perfect polarization, the probability that a PMRW exists is quite high. When voters’ preferences are at all close to reflecting a situation in which a unifying candidate exists, the probability that a PMRW exists is very high. It is very important to note that the associated under
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:30:46 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:14:42 | 只看該作者
Shanben Chen,Yuming Zhang,Zhili Fengthat are associated with Condorcet’s Paradox. There is widespread, but not universal, acceptance of the notion that the PMRW is the best candidate for selection in an election process, when such a candidate exists. When Condorcet’s Paradox occurs, there is no PMRW in three-candidate elections, and t
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:33:12 | 只看該作者
Ding Fan,Xiaochun Dun,Gang Zhang,Yu Shi, we must conclude that the evidence does not suggest that the phenomenon is widespread in voting situations. However, there clearly are cases in which the evidence shows that Condorcet’s Paradox has occurred in actual elections. The most typical observations of the phenomenon occur when there are a
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:13:08 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:02:12 | 只看該作者
Shanben Chen,Yuming Zhang,Zhili Fenge-troughedness, or perfect polarization, the probability that a PMRW exists is quite high. When voters’ preferences are at all close to reflecting a situation in which a unifying candidate exists, the probability that a PMRW exists is very high. It is very important to note that the associated under
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:16:22 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-16 14:25
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
高密市| 梧州市| 长兴县| 武冈市| 甘泉县| 陕西省| 宁城县| 嘉黎县| 达尔| 潮安县| 拉孜县| 江油市| 勐海县| 韶关市| 伊川县| 温州市| 华阴市| 井冈山市| 宁阳县| 闸北区| 哈密市| 武宣县| 三明市| 博客| 安岳县| 铜鼓县| 闻喜县| 大邑县| 五原县| 平邑县| 金塔县| 万州区| 花莲市| 兴山县| 北京市| 日照市| 巩义市| 九龙县| 泸定县| 开平市| 韶山市|