找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Concepts in Law; Jaap C. Hage,Dietmar Pfordten Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Dworkin.Hart.Hart Dworkin debate.concep

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 36267|回復(fù): 41
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:39:16 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Concepts in Law
編輯Jaap C. Hage,Dietmar Pfordten
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/235/234925/234925.mp4
概述The only recent book on the market with legal concepts as its central theme.State-of-the-art discussion of theories of meaning as applied to the law.Selected papers from the IVR-2007 special workshop
叢書(shū)名稱Law and Philosophy Library
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Concepts in Law;  Jaap C. Hage,Dietmar Pfordten Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Dworkin.Hart.Hart Dworkin debate.concep
描述.During the last decades, legal theory has focused almost completely on norms, rules and arguments as the constitutive elements of law. Concepts were mostly neglected. The contributions to this volume try to remedy this neglect by elucidating the role concepts play in law from different perspectives. A main aim of this volume is to initiate a debate about concepts in law. ?ke Fr?ndberg gives an overview of the many different uses of concepts in law and shows amongst others that concepts in the law should not be confused with the role of concepts in descriptions of the law. Dietmar von der Pfordten criticizes the restriction to norms as parts of the law in contemporary legal theory by questioning what concepts are and what their function is, both in general and in legal conceptual schemes. Giovanni Sartor assumes the inferential analysis of meaning proposed by Alf Ross in his ground breaking paper T?-t? and addresses the question how possession of a concept, including the rules defining it, is possible without endorsing these rules. Jaap Hage argues that 1. legal status words such as ‘owner‘ have a meaning because they denote things or relations in institutional reality, 2. the mean
出版日期Book 2009
關(guān)鍵詞Dworkin; Hart; Hart Dworkin debate; concepts in Law; inferential meaning; law; legal competence; legal conc
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2982-9
isbn_softcover978-94-007-3674-0
isbn_ebook978-90-481-2982-9Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
issn_series 1572-4395
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Concepts in Law影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Concepts in Law影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Concepts in Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Concepts in Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Concepts in Law被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Concepts in Law被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Concepts in Law年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Concepts in Law年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Concepts in Law讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Concepts in Law讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:30:20 | 只看該作者
About Concepts in Law,sary aims like justice (Plato, Aristotle, Radbruch), self-preservation (Hobbes), property (Locke), or freedom (Kant, Hegel), but only to contingent means. One might call this ‘instrumentalism’. Second: The plurality of the decisive means and elements of law is – with notable exceptions. – silently a
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:34:45 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:27:48 | 只看該作者
The Meaning of Legal Status Words,sequences, no clear standing. These words include – for Dutch law – ‘right holder’, ‘owner’, ‘mayor’, and ‘criminal suspect’. They differ – again for Dutch law – from other words such as ‘obligation’, which stands for a combination of a legal duty and a corresponding claim right, and ‘sanction’ whic
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:51:40 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:54:08 | 只看該作者
The Influence of Normative Reasons on the Formation of Legal Concepts,e, unclear whether they have a legal, a semantic or a dual nature. This background is particularly important for two questions which every legal system needs to answer. The first is which concepts to use. The second is how to define them. The answer to both questions is what I will call the formatio
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:26:40 | 只看該作者
The Hand of Midas: When Concepts Turn Legal, or Deflating the Hart-Dworkin Debate,arket, legal texts almost invariably use no technical terms. But despite the familiarity of the language used, lay people still get the impression that they do not really understand the legal texts. What they experience is a well-established fact of linguistics. Different areas of discourse have the
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:36:37 | 只看該作者
After Conceptual Analysis: The Rise of Practice Theory,n – has exhibited a sustained focus on identifying the constitutive features of law. For some time, this question has been framed as the search for the essential or necessary features of the concept of ‘law’. But a look at the tradition reveals that this is only one of a number of ways of looking at
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:21:21 | 只看該作者
Explicating the Concept of Legal Competence,nce in the sense of authority.. The concept of legal competence, thus conceived, is a normative concept, in the sense that a person has competence by virtue of a norm, and that the exercise of competence changes a person’s normative position.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:17:17 | 只看該作者
The Hand of Midas: When Concepts Turn Legal, or Deflating the Hart-Dworkin Debate,t they do not really understand the legal texts. What they experience is a well-established fact of linguistics. Different areas of discourse have their own language. And even if different areas of discourse employ the same term, it may well have a different content.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-12 17:47
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
卢氏县| 北碚区| 阿瓦提县| 绵竹市| 肇庆市| 高台县| 塔河县| 嘉义县| 吕梁市| 凭祥市| 马边| 万荣县| 河东区| 玉田县| 类乌齐县| 宕昌县| 全椒县| 神农架林区| 老河口市| 昆山市| 平舆县| 汤阴县| 惠安县| 明水县| 潼南县| 湖州市| 哈巴河县| 普安县| 内丘县| 福鼎市| 新源县| 绵阳市| 碌曲县| 来安县| 佛山市| 乌鲁木齐县| 乌恰县| 黑山县| 邵武市| 舞钢市| 屯门区|