找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Compositionality, Context and Semantic Values; Essays in Honour of Robert J. Stainton,Christopher Viger Book 2009 Springer Science+Busines

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Buren
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 11:00:53 | 只看該作者
Steel Design for Engineers and Architectsthe roles of pointwise and setwise truth properties in modal logic. I argue that thinking of supertruth and determinate truth as setwise truth properties allows an understanding of supervaluationist approaches to vagueness which escapes both Williamson’s objections to and a needless metalinguistic orientation of traditional supervaluationism.
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:15:08 | 只看該作者
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 20:26:11 | 只看該作者
Outlines of external development,pels Cappelen and Lepore to endorse their positive view is CSAs, the very arguments they claim to be unsound. Thus there is a considerable amount of tension in their views. My goal here is to resolve this tension by defending CSAs from Cappelen and Lepore‘s criticism, and to illustrate why one should endorse these arguments.
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 00:21:03 | 只看該作者
“If”, “Unless”, and Quantificationtements to restrict the quantifiers in whose scope they occur, while also contributing a covert modal element to the semantics. In providing this account, I also offer a semantics for unquantified statements containing ‘unless‘.
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 05:27:12 | 只看該作者
In Defense of Context Shifting Argumentspels Cappelen and Lepore to endorse their positive view is CSAs, the very arguments they claim to be unsound. Thus there is a considerable amount of tension in their views. My goal here is to resolve this tension by defending CSAs from Cappelen and Lepore‘s criticism, and to illustrate why one should endorse these arguments.
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 09:21:02 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 12:12:46 | 只看該作者
On Failing to Capture some (or even all) of what is Communicated overt phenomena under study. But this claim, I contend, is false. In actual practice, scientific models will often never capture all of the behavior of the relevant phenomenon, and this feature does not undermine them as such. I maintain that semantic theorizing is just an instance of this more general aspect of scientific methodology.
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 15:04:22 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:22:56 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 02:26:54 | 只看該作者
Outlines of external development, is little reason to believe that our words have such context-invariant meanings, and I suggest that the pragmatic picture of assertion can secure a rich enough conception of objectivity to address the skeptic.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-9 09:41
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
东兰县| 无锡市| 六安市| 融水| 五大连池市| 同心县| 泸溪县| 涪陵区| 革吉县| 介休市| 林州市| 崇义县| 库尔勒市| 仁怀市| 曲沃县| 昌吉市| 陆良县| 德格县| 汪清县| 平塘县| 通化市| 张家界市| 红桥区| 雷山县| 托克托县| 湟中县| 仪征市| 福泉市| 泸西县| 亚东县| 浦城县| 达州市| 格尔木市| 老河口市| 通榆县| 上高县| 江西省| 花垣县| 淅川县| 邻水| 涟源市|