找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Compositionality, Context and Semantic Values; Essays in Honour of Robert J. Stainton,Christopher Viger Book 2009 Springer Science+Busines

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Buren
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 11:00:53 | 只看該作者
Steel Design for Engineers and Architectsthe roles of pointwise and setwise truth properties in modal logic. I argue that thinking of supertruth and determinate truth as setwise truth properties allows an understanding of supervaluationist approaches to vagueness which escapes both Williamson’s objections to and a needless metalinguistic orientation of traditional supervaluationism.
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:15:08 | 只看該作者
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 20:26:11 | 只看該作者
Outlines of external development,pels Cappelen and Lepore to endorse their positive view is CSAs, the very arguments they claim to be unsound. Thus there is a considerable amount of tension in their views. My goal here is to resolve this tension by defending CSAs from Cappelen and Lepore‘s criticism, and to illustrate why one should endorse these arguments.
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 00:21:03 | 只看該作者
“If”, “Unless”, and Quantificationtements to restrict the quantifiers in whose scope they occur, while also contributing a covert modal element to the semantics. In providing this account, I also offer a semantics for unquantified statements containing ‘unless‘.
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 05:27:12 | 只看該作者
In Defense of Context Shifting Argumentspels Cappelen and Lepore to endorse their positive view is CSAs, the very arguments they claim to be unsound. Thus there is a considerable amount of tension in their views. My goal here is to resolve this tension by defending CSAs from Cappelen and Lepore‘s criticism, and to illustrate why one should endorse these arguments.
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 09:21:02 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 12:12:46 | 只看該作者
On Failing to Capture some (or even all) of what is Communicated overt phenomena under study. But this claim, I contend, is false. In actual practice, scientific models will often never capture all of the behavior of the relevant phenomenon, and this feature does not undermine them as such. I maintain that semantic theorizing is just an instance of this more general aspect of scientific methodology.
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 15:04:22 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:22:56 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 02:26:54 | 只看該作者
Outlines of external development, is little reason to believe that our words have such context-invariant meanings, and I suggest that the pragmatic picture of assertion can secure a rich enough conception of objectivity to address the skeptic.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-9 09:41
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
右玉县| 左贡县| 莱阳市| 双辽市| 富宁县| 伊金霍洛旗| 伊宁市| 昭通市| 临桂县| 左权县| 凤阳县| 双柏县| 宁波市| 隆德县| 普兰县| 延吉市| 康马县| 祁东县| 聊城市| 星子县| 内丘县| 台东县| 华阴市| 华蓥市| 沅陵县| 黄梅县| 新干县| 灵寿县| 那曲县| 彰化县| 双柏县| 资溪县| 城步| 松阳县| 苍溪县| 白山市| 霞浦县| 九寨沟县| 成安县| 阳新县| 富宁县|