Titlebook: Comparative Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Omnibus Legislation; Ittai Bar-Siman-Tov Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Aut

無法仿效

書目名稱Comparative Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Omnibus Legislation影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Comparative Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Omnibus Legislation影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Comparative Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Omnibus Legislation網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Comparative Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Omnibus Legislation網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Comparative Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Omnibus Legislation被引頻次




書目名稱Comparative Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Omnibus Legislation被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Comparative Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Omnibus Legislation年度引用




書目名稱Comparative Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Omnibus Legislation年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Comparative Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Omnibus Legislation讀者反饋




書目名稱Comparative Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Omnibus Legislation讀者反饋學科排名

Encoding

Die Unwahrscheinlichkeit der Kommunikationc systems, wherein the executive benefits disproportionately from omnibus usage to the detriment of the legislature, omnibus bills by and large benefit Congress more than the president. Within Congress, majority party members benefit more from their use than do minority party members. The discussion

Indolent

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-01341-9 is a process that centralizes, rather than?decentralizes, regulatory powers. In particular, the MOF was involved in nearly 60 percent of all delegations through four mechanisms of centralization: (1) vesting itself with?an authority to create regulation; (2) vesting itself and another ministry with

Overdose

Machtkreislauf und Recht in Demokratienthe inner-logic of rationalization within the State paradoxically lead to de-rationalize the legislative procedure, i.e. a greater complexity and legal as well as political uncertainty in the passing of such bills.

留戀

無表情

Ich sehe was, was Du nicht siehst,main conclusion is that countries where such legislation exists, find it impossible to get rid of it altogether and permanently, but that if there is political will some of its worst abuses can be modified.

無表情

Agility

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92478-6 preliminary remarks on the single subject dogma, I begin with a brief survey of the recent Spanish experience in this area (starting from the abuse of budget laws as a multipurpose regulatory tool in the 1980s). Thereafter I concentrate on the latest constitutional case law dealing with the problem

GROVE

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94168-4by the advisors to and members of Parliament. The paper points out which measures have indeed led to improvement, and concludes that especially arrangement laws—i.e. omnibus laws with a budgetary purpose—remain most problematic and vulnerable for abuse. In the end, it takes a serious shift in politi

Vsd168