Titlebook: Communicating Genetics; Visualizations and R Han Yu Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Genetics.DNA.Popular Sci

本義

書目名稱Communicating Genetics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Communicating Genetics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Communicating Genetics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Communicating Genetics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Communicating Genetics被引頻次




書目名稱Communicating Genetics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Communicating Genetics年度引用




書目名稱Communicating Genetics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Communicating Genetics讀者反饋




書目名稱Communicating Genetics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

STENT

definition

Efflorescent

詢問

The Circadian Clock in the Mammalian Kidney,ode images (in such forms as collages and games) became simplistic, vague, though entertaining. Given the anticipated personalized genome sequencing, we need considerable research and efforts to develop public-facing visual representations of the genetic code that are interactive, meaningful, and accessible.

嚴重傷害

嚴重傷害

Wilderich Tuschmann,Peter Hawigwever, because publics lack access to computer modeling programs and must imagine 3D structures via 2D prints, computer models lose their inherent advantage. The chapter recommends Web applets that allow publics direct interaction with molecular modeling and suggests areas for further research.

CANDY

Wilderich Tuschmann,Peter Hawigts influence on citizens’ life, popular communication of genetics is a topic that will grow in importance. This communication involves complex and often conflicting cognitive, affective, and social-cultural dimensions, negates simple “best practices,” and demands dynamic and eclectic research.

從容

Introduction: Visualizing Genetics for Public Readers,mages, the book draws upon information design and social semiotics theories. These two theories reveal, on the one hand, images’ apparent appearance and affordance in information delivery and, on the other hand, their implied messages, emotions, and value stances.

織布機

The Photographic View: Observational Record and Symbolic Excess,r emotions; examples include Photoshopped pictures of genetically modified organisms or pictures of human participants in research. These photographs highlight the social/ethical ramifications of genetic research but may also discourage productive conversation and belie gender and racial biases.