Titlebook: Common Security and Strategic Reform; A Critical Analysis Andrew Butfoy Book 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Li

到凝乳

書目名稱Common Security and Strategic Reform影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Common Security and Strategic Reform影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Common Security and Strategic Reform網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Common Security and Strategic Reform網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Common Security and Strategic Reform被引頻次




書目名稱Common Security and Strategic Reform被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Common Security and Strategic Reform年度引用




書目名稱Common Security and Strategic Reform年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Common Security and Strategic Reform讀者反饋




書目名稱Common Security and Strategic Reform讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

過多

Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1997

悅耳

obtuse

Introduction: Society and the Unconscious,common security. The concept arose out of concerns with the nature and direction of world politics as they appeared during the Cold War. Common security was presented as a way of moving beyond a world dominated by the arms race and towards an alternative world which would be marked by states, and pe

corpuscle

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66175-8a has been central to the evolution of common security thinking; it remains pivotal to many schemes for strategic reform. For instance, views on the security dilemma frequently shape and colour the debate on non-offensive defence, arms control and CSBMs.

油氈

Harri Jalonen,Alisa Puustinen,Harri Raisioce may have a brighter future. This springs from one overriding fact: in contrast to NOD, NTD is much more permissive; in particular, NTD does not require the elimination of any offensive conventional military capabilities. As a consequence, NTD can be made more politically and bureaucratically appe

油氈

Emotions in Customer Experiencea tool of superpower competition and as a device to deflect calls for disarmament. Arms control, it seemed, was about creating the . that cuts were occurring — while in reality it merely set permissive and hardly meaningful limits on arms acquisition policies. Arms control was so tied to the politic

committed

sacrum

CANDY