找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Common Law – Civil Law; The Great Divide? Nicoletta Bersier,Christoph Bezemek,Frederick Scha Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and Th

[復制鏈接]
查看: 47686|回復: 48
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:06:01 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law
副標題The Great Divide?
編輯Nicoletta Bersier,Christoph Bezemek,Frederick Scha
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/231/230289/230289.mp4
概述Offers analysis of the differences between common law and civil law systems from various theoretical perspectives.A global network of experts approaching the topic against the background of different
叢書名稱Law and Philosophy Library
圖書封面Titlebook: Common Law – Civil Law; The Great Divide? Nicoletta Bersier,Christoph Bezemek,Frederick Scha Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and Th
描述This book offers an in-depth analysis of the differences between common law and civil law systems from various theoretical perspectives. Written by a global network of experts, it explores the topic against the background of a variety of legal traditions..Common law and civil law are typically presented as antagonistic players on a field claimed by diverse legal systems: the former being based on precedent set by judges in deciding cases before them; the latter being founded on a set of rules intended to govern the decisions of those applying them. Perceived in this manner, common law and civil law differ in terms of the (main) source(s) of law; who is to create them; who is (merely) to draw from them; and whether the law itself is pure each step of the way, or whether the law’s purity may be tarnished when confronted with a set of contingent facts. These differences have deep roots in (legal) history – roots that allow us to trace them back to distinct traditions.Nevertheless, it is questionable whether the divide thus depicted is as great as it may seem: international and supranational legal systems unconcerned by national peculiarities appear to level the playing field. A normat
出版日期Book 2022
關鍵詞Common Law; Civil Law; Judges; Statutes; Sources of Law; Case Law; Legal Traditions; Positivism; Legislation
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87718-7
isbn_softcover978-3-030-87720-0
isbn_ebook978-3-030-87718-7Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
issn_series 1572-4395
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law被引頻次




書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law年度引用




書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law讀者反饋




書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:31:07 | 只看該作者
Civil Law, Common Law, and the Data of Jurisprudence,eeking to understand the nature of law itself, or even, as some would put it, the nature of the concept of law, we need to have some idea of something in the world that we are examining. That is, we need to start with the . that supports jurisprudential theory. So-called legal pluralists claim that
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:09:40 | 只看該作者
,The Chain Novel and Its Normative Fine Structure in Civil Law and Common Law: ,, , and Law’s Normath respect to civil law. Dworkin explained law as a specific genre of literature—the chain novel—where several authors collaborate in writing a novel and each author builds her chapter on the previous chapters in the chain by creatively interpreting them. Brandom built on Dworkin’s chain novel of law
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:12:57 | 只看該作者
The Civil Law as the Foundation of the Common Law: Roscoe Pound Considers the Origins of the Commonretation, and law-application, they also differ in their methods of reasoning and in their use of authority. This chapter focuses on these differences in reasoning and treatment of authority. It does so, however, not so much as an end in itself, but as an entry into aspects of the thinking of Roscoe
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:42:44 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:09:23 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:45:23 | 只看該作者
Profiling the American Judge: A Comparative Argument About Ideological Conceptions of Judging,essay pursues the opposite emphasis. It explores some traits of the ideological conception of judging typically associated with the American culture so as to show that remarkable differences in the judicial practice between systems may actually persist regardless of the similarities on the instituti
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:37:59 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:16:46 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:32:06 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-16 18:46
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
衢州市| 色达县| 灵丘县| 菏泽市| 宣城市| 从化市| 咸丰县| 大名县| 绵阳市| 宜宾县| 贵南县| 巨野县| 杂多县| 石城县| 长阳| 惠安县| 玉树县| 四子王旗| 西藏| 洛阳市| 永济市| 含山县| 甘谷县| 丹江口市| 澄城县| 双城市| 青龙| 佛教| 安阳县| 佛山市| 华阴市| 张家川| 东乡族自治县| 牡丹江市| 安远县| 平乐县| 环江| 西青区| 富阳市| 驻马店市| 张掖市|