找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Common Good and Self-Interest in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy; Heikki Haara,Juhana Toivanen Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2024 The Editor(s) (if ap

[復制鏈接]
查看: 26103|回復: 52
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:25:48 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Common Good and Self-Interest in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy
編輯Heikki Haara,Juhana Toivanen
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/231/230281/230281.mp4
概述This book is open access, which means that you have free and unlimited access.Covers discussions on the common good over the transition from the middle ages to the early modern period..Provides a new
叢書名稱The New Synthese Historical Library
圖書封面Titlebook: Common Good and Self-Interest in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy;  Heikki Haara,Juhana Toivanen Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2024 The Editor(s) (if ap
描述.This?open access?volume provides an in-depth analysis of philosophical discussions concerning the common good?and its relation to self-interest in the history of Western philosophy. The thirteen chapters explore both renowned and lesser-known thinkers from the Middle Ages to the eighteenth century, covering also the relevant ancient background. By bridging the gap between the medieval and early modern periods, they provide fresh insights into how moral and political philosophers understood the concepts of the common good and self-interest, along with their ethical and political implications. The concept of the common good occupies a central role in philosophical reflections on the public and private dimensions of moral and social life in contemporary debates. By exploring the rich and diverse ways in which the relationship between the common good and self-interest has been understood, this volume has the potential to contribute to our ongoing efforts to critically discern the possibilities and limitations of these concepts in the present. Thus, the volume will be useful for scholars interested in the multi-layered role of the notion of the common good both in the history of philos
出版日期Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2024
關鍵詞Common Good; History of Philosophy; Individual and Community; Ethical Egoism; Eudaimonism; Political Theo
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55304-2
isbn_softcover978-3-031-55306-6
isbn_ebook978-3-031-55304-2Series ISSN 1879-8578 Series E-ISSN 2352-2585
issn_series 1879-8578
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2024
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Common Good and Self-Interest in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Common Good and Self-Interest in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Common Good and Self-Interest in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy網絡公開度




書目名稱Common Good and Self-Interest in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Common Good and Self-Interest in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy被引頻次




書目名稱Common Good and Self-Interest in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Common Good and Self-Interest in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy年度引用




書目名稱Common Good and Self-Interest in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Common Good and Self-Interest in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy讀者反饋




書目名稱Common Good and Self-Interest in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:43:16 | 只看該作者
Medieval Monastic Ideas of the Compatibility Between the Individual and the Common Goodndividual authors (Peter Abelard, Hugh of St Victor and Aelred of Rievaulx), the chapter will systematically discuss scattered but original developments that contributed to later theoretical analyses of the common good and individual good.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:30:14 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:35:32 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:33:55 | 只看該作者
Old Wine in New Wineskins: William Ockham and the Common Good in Contextstitutional form), motivated by Ockham’s awareness of the intrinsic contingency and mutability of historical events. Indeed, safeguarding the common good in certain situations, according to the English Franciscan, may require a solution that deviates from the ideal paradigm. In the course of the ana
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:20:48 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:40:23 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:41:41 | 只看該作者
The Compatibility of Individual and Common Good in Hobbes’s Philosophytic political scenario for Hobbes. Real politics requires defusing potential conflict between individual goods and the common good in a different way: namely, by encouraging citizens to accept the sovereign’s judgement of what is “good”. Nevertheless, there are limits to what subjects will accept. T
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:48:51 | 只看該作者
Self-Interest as a Source of the Common Good in Post-Hobbesian Natural Law for people to consider the advantage of others and it leads them to promote the common good. This chapter also points out notable differences between Cumberland’s and Pufendorf’s treatment of the relation between the private good and the common good.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:03:45 | 只看該作者
Self-Interest and the Common Good in Early Modern Philosophyf individuals, and (3) less tied to thick notions of community (including the state) and more amenable to empire. I conclude by bringing out the significance of these claims for our thinking about self-interest, the common good, and community.
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-9 13:33
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
屏山县| 黄山市| 溧阳市| 峨眉山市| 固原市| 阿合奇县| 延寿县| 乡宁县| 南丰县| 曲阳县| 观塘区| 恩施市| 汪清县| 德庆县| 秦安县| 金华市| 凤冈县| 商都县| 蓬莱市| 南溪县| 麻江县| 宝鸡市| 石林| 南投县| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 瑞安市| 洪泽县| 张家港市| 盐城市| 大名县| 扎赉特旗| 普兰县| 新巴尔虎右旗| 勐海县| 宝清县| 和龙市| 中西区| 炎陵县| 江津市| 临沧市| 南和县|