Titlebook: Coming to Terms with Superdiversity; The Case of Rotterda Peter Scholten,Maurice Crul,Paul van de Laar Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2019 The Editor(s) (if

lobster

https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-02253-0al. Roughly half of the population of either city has an immigrant background, but considerable differences exist in the nature of these migrant populations. Particularly striking is that Amsterdam’s immigrant population is much more highly skilled than Rotterdam’s. This is also the case for the nat

漫不經(jīng)心

Measures of Social Stratification, has persisted, even though it is generally acknowledged that integration is a two-way process in which not only migrants, but also the established population play an important role (see, for example, Garces-Mascareňas and Penninx 2016; Martinovic 2013). Amsterdam and Rotterdam have both become majo

Prophylaxis

antedate

FOR

Social Inequality, Childhood and the Media,y seems to disrupt common contemporary narratives concerning migration and cities. That is, social scientists since Simmel have postulated that cities are largely incubators of cosmopolitanism, or openness (if only indifference) to socio-cultural differences. It is often presumed that such openness

和平主義

Consensus

coagulation

Coming to Terms with Superdiversity978-3-319-96041-8Series ISSN 2364-4087 Series E-ISSN 2364-4095

Range-Of-Motion

Introduction,places where integration in society starts. Many cities have experienced centuries of immigration and consider migration as a core element of their identity (such as New York and Amsterdam). In an increasing number of Western European cities, even more than half of the population has a migration bac

報復(fù)