找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971; Ellen R. Feingold Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 31906|回復(fù): 40
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:19:26 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971
編輯Ellen R. Feingold
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/230/229671/229671.mp4
概述Provides the first account of the development and decolonization of a British colonial high court in Africa, as well as the first account of the development and decline of the Colonial Legal Service.T
叢書(shū)名稱Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971;  Ellen R. Feingold Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an
描述.This book is the first study of the development and decolonization of a British colonial high court in Africa. It traces the history of the High Court of Tanzania from its establishment in 1920 to the end of its institutional process of decolonization in 1971. This process involved disentangling the High Court from colonial state structures and imperial systems that were built on racial inequality while simultaneously increasing the independence of the judiciary and application of British judicial principles.? Feingold weaves together the rich history of the Court with a discussion of its judges – both as members of the British Colonial Legal Service and as individuals – to explore the impacts and intersections of imperial policies, national politics, and individual initiative. .Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania. is a powerful reminder of the crucial roles played by common law courts in the operation and legitimization of both colonial and post-colonial states.?.
出版日期Book 2018
關(guān)鍵詞British Empire; Tanganyika; law; judges; High Court; national independence; justice; race; foreign policy
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69691-1
isbn_softcover978-3-319-88823-1
isbn_ebook978-3-319-69691-1Series ISSN 2635-1633 Series E-ISSN 2635-1641
issn_series 2635-1633
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

1票 100.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:25:22 | 只看該作者
Conclusion,g colonial rule and then amid the growth of executive authority in the late 1960s and 1970s. It also asserts that this book’s approach to assessing the decolonisation of the High Court of Tanzania—especially its emphasis on the High Court’s place in the structure of the court system and judicial per
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:23:46 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:28:27 | 只看該作者
The Marginalisation of the High Court Under Indirect Rule, 1920–1944nyika, colonial judges and professional magistrates were increasingly marginalised in the sphere of colonial justice by the administration. The Native Courts Ordinance of 1929 removed the Native Courts from the jurisdiction of the High Court and allowed the administration to prevent Africans from ac
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:15:05 | 只看該作者
The Resurgence and Expansion of Tanganyika’s Judiciary, 1945–1958tion and stature of the colonial judiciary. The size and geographic reach of the professional judiciary expanded and the administration took the first steps towards integrating the dual court systems, giving colonial judges a role in deciding appeals from Native Courts. This chapter asserts that as
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:02:43 | 只看該作者
Restructuring Colonial Justice, Empowering the High Court, 1959–1964tive than it had during colonial rule. Once the constitutional framework was in place, the government worked to unify the colonial court systems and replaced the lower courts with a new system of magistrates’ courts under the jurisdiction of the High Court. This chapter illustrates how the unificati
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:09:16 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:33:39 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:11:13 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69691-1British Empire; Tanganyika; law; judges; High Court; national independence; justice; race; foreign policy
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:13:48 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 22:59
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
花莲市| 文昌市| 乌拉特前旗| 绵阳市| 且末县| 巧家县| 广宁县| 巴楚县| 化隆| 金坛市| 怀化市| 斗六市| 莫力| 巴青县| 铁岭县| 礼泉县| 会昌县| 永德县| 淳安县| 泾阳县| 阳泉市| 普定县| 天祝| 嘉鱼县| 孟州市| 临桂县| 故城县| 巧家县| 灵石县| 获嘉县| 通化县| 亳州市| 宿迁市| 色达县| 江门市| 娱乐| 金乡县| 日喀则市| 蒙城县| 重庆市| 长葛市|