找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Collective Identity and Integration Policy in Denmark and Sweden; Marilena Geugjes Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(

[復(fù)制鏈接]
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 05:07:27 | 只看該作者
D. N. Granger,I. Kurose,P. Kubesings and the former glorious empire as well as its massive territorial losses and the consequent effort to preserve what little was left. The little that was left, i.e. the small country, the homogenous ., the language that no one else spoke, and the religion that everybody shared, was further conde
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 08:06:53 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33972-2Collective/National Identity; Integration; Migration; Denmark; Sweden
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 15:15:44 | 只看該作者
978-3-658-33971-5The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Fachmedien Wies
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 18:16:44 | 只看該作者
Collective Identity and Integration Policy in Denmark and Sweden978-3-658-33972-2Series ISSN 2567-3076 Series E-ISSN 2567-3157
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 22:24:38 | 只看該作者
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 02:26:31 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 05:31:10 | 只看該作者
Shock, Sepsis, and Organ Failuren ‘classic’ novels were analysed. Recurrent patterns, images, and narratives concerning Danishness could be found throughout the material and will be presented in the following. These findings are located on three different levels, which constitutes the chapter structure.
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 09:43:53 | 只看該作者
Shock, Sepsis, and Organ FailureIn September 2016, ., the US’ oldest continuously published weekly, bore the title “If Sweden and Denmark Are So Progressive, Why Did They Close Their Doors to Refugees?” (The Nation 2016). This question implies three assumptions that will be central to this book.
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 16:04:39 | 只看該作者
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 18:26:05 | 只看該作者
Introduction,In September 2016, ., the US’ oldest continuously published weekly, bore the title “If Sweden and Denmark Are So Progressive, Why Did They Close Their Doors to Refugees?” (The Nation 2016). This question implies three assumptions that will be central to this book.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 16:24
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
临武县| 五华县| 新巴尔虎右旗| 紫阳县| 云安县| 建德市| 光山县| 竹溪县| 屏东市| 潼南县| 通辽市| 洛川县| 年辖:市辖区| 壶关县| 炎陵县| 彰武县| 筠连县| 台北市| 托克逊县| 易门县| 岳阳市| 馆陶县| 哈尔滨市| 故城县| 云梦县| 南皮县| 巫溪县| 巴里| 隆昌县| 晋江市| 祁东县| 堆龙德庆县| 灵璧县| 项城市| 福建省| 将乐县| 丹江口市| 长白| 望都县| 通化县| 济阳县|