找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Collected Papers of Stig Kanger with Essays on his Life and Work; Ghita Holmstr?m-Hintikka,Sten Lindstr?m,Rysiek Sli Book 2001 Kluwer Acad

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: mandatory
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 15:04:32 | 只看該作者
Collected Papers of Stig Kanger with Essays on his Life and Work978-94-010-0500-5Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 19:39:02 | 只看該作者
Sheaves, Games, and Model Completionstockholm. My intention at that time was to present a technique of logical proof that would be easier to master than those usually encountered in textbooks on logic. Thus, the essay may be regarded as having a kind of pedagogical aim. It is hoped that this aim is not overshadowed by the technical character of my exposition.
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 23:06:02 | 只看該作者
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 04:45:27 | 只看該作者
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 11:09:51 | 只看該作者
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 13:09:42 | 只看該作者
Earth and Environmental Sciences Libraryn respect of a state of affairs. Rights can be of different types; for example, claim, power, or immunity. When a person X, for instance, has a claim to recover what he has lent to Y, this can be understood as X’s having a rights-relation of type claim to Y in respect of the state of affairs that X receives from Y what he has lent to Y.
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 17:46:50 | 只看該作者
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 22:59:16 | 只看該作者
0166-6991 ined significant results in proof theory as wellas the first fully worked out model-theoretic interpretation ofquantified modal logic. It is generally accepted nowadays that Kangerwas one of the originators of possible worlds semantics for modallogic. Kanger‘s most original achievements were in the
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 01:54:28 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4047-4of this type can be found in practically every textbook of elementary logic. Within each type there are several variants. It should also be pointed out that the three types are not strictly separated but allow of hybrid forms.
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 05:53:04 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88113-1by these three kinds of philosophers all belong to the wide domain of ethics, and they are easily confused. However, we shall try not to confuse them here, and for that purpose, we may put them under three distinct headings:
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 00:48
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
英超| 丹棱县| 雅安市| 灌南县| 建宁县| 毕节市| 甘洛县| 灵山县| 普兰县| 东安县| 云安县| 呼玛县| 昭通市| 福州市| 金塔县| 阜阳市| 河北区| 定日县| 辉南县| 合水县| 成安县| 天镇县| 彭州市| 余庆县| 孟津县| 安西县| 蓬溪县| 马关县| 永吉县| 湘阴县| 观塘区| 平邑县| 岚皋县| 交口县| 金寨县| 宜丰县| 眉山市| 弥勒县| 乐业县| 霍邱县| 乌恰县|