找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Coherence: Insights from Philosophy, Jurisprudence and Artificial Intelligence; Micha? Araszkiewicz,Jaromír ?avelka Book 2013 Springer Sci

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 駝峰
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 10:32:20 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/b101873t-solving activities; (2) on their normative reading, in turn, defeasibilist proposals of conflict-processing do not seem to be very promising, for they are either reducible to deductivist approaches or are not able to solve normative inconsistencies.
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:05:03 | 只看該作者
Data Models for Semistructured Data,could be seen as a contributor to procedural coherence in case-based reasoning and local forms of substantive coherence, but not to global forms of coherence given the computational complexity of managing those more ambitious forms of coherence.
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:01:52 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/b101873st in relation to the existence of legal social practice—that what seems correct to most members of a community determines what is effectively correct. Does a space exist between these two versions of objectivity? In this essay arguments are put forward in support of a negative answer.
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 02:07:29 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/b101873that codified legal solutions do not conflict with other legal solutions to related or distinct problems. If it is possible to reduce legal enactments to such a schema, the likely result will be a greater ease of the representation of legal rules by computer systems, while the pattern language encourages progress toward an ideal of coherence.
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 04:55:22 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 07:14:30 | 只看該作者
Tok Wang Ling,Mong Li Lee,Gillian Dobbie The main motivation of legal coherentism is to provide a non-skeptical alternative to formalism; (9) The coherence theory of legal justification is psychologically plausible and this provides an argument in favor of this theory; (10) Legal coherentism is an agent-centered theory of justification.
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 13:25:36 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 15:10:46 | 只看該作者
Pattern Languages and Institutional Facts: Functions and Coherences in the Law,that codified legal solutions do not conflict with other legal solutions to related or distinct problems. If it is possible to reduce legal enactments to such a schema, the likely result will be a greater ease of the representation of legal rules by computer systems, while the pattern language encourages progress toward an ideal of coherence.
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:08:18 | 只看該作者
Coherence as Constraint Satisfaction: Judicial Reasoning Support Mechanism, deployment is then formulated. Finally, coherence as constraint satisfaction is briefly checked if it meets the requirements. It is concluded that it seems to meet them and thus, to be a mechanism worth considering of a large-scale deployment as a judicial reasoning support formalism.
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 23:40:27 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-25 03:35
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
鲁甸县| 彭山县| 黄浦区| 海伦市| 郓城县| 眉山市| 隆回县| 开化县| 淮滨县| 原平市| 惠安县| 清远市| 姜堰市| 甘谷县| 扬中市| 东至县| 江城| 海阳市| 石渠县| 巴彦淖尔市| 左云县| 额敏县| 兴隆县| 林州市| 桐庐县| 界首市| 武胜县| 辽中县| 安丘市| 舒兰市| 鄢陵县| 大渡口区| 穆棱市| 虞城县| 三门县| 静安区| 固阳县| 永新县| 阿尔山市| 巢湖市| 临朐县|