Titlebook: Coherence, Truth and Testimony; Ulrich G?hde,Stephan Hartmann Book 2005 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2005 coherence.foundation.iss

娛樂某人

書目名稱Coherence, Truth and Testimony影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Coherence, Truth and Testimony影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Coherence, Truth and Testimony網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Coherence, Truth and Testimony網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Coherence, Truth and Testimony被引頻次




書目名稱Coherence, Truth and Testimony被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Coherence, Truth and Testimony年度引用




書目名稱Coherence, Truth and Testimony年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Coherence, Truth and Testimony讀者反饋




書目名稱Coherence, Truth and Testimony讀者反饋學科排名

不幸的人

煞費苦心

Coherence and the Truth Connection,th this is just a matter of luck. Coherence theories embrace falliblism, to be sure, but that does not sustain the objection. Coherence is connected with truth by principles of justified acceptance that explain the connection between coherence and truth. Coherence is connected with truth by explanatory principle, not just luck.

機構

無辜

Ulrich G?hde,Stephan HartmannThe topic of the book is "hot" at the moment.The book makes novel philosophical as well as technical contributions to the literature.The essays are very well written and the collection is suited as a

BROW

http://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/229194.jpg

BROW

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08786-9ss automatically respond to a claim by accepting it, as long as the claim made is consistent with their beliefs and the source is credible. Otherwise, people enter a reflective pathway in which they evaluate the claim based on its explanatory coherence with everything else they believe. Computer sim

錯事

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08786-9a higher degree of coherence among pieces of evidence raises to a higher degree the probability of the proposition they support. I argue against this view on the basis of three related observations. First, we should be able to assess the impact of coherence on any hypothesis of interest the evidence

上流社會

Affine maps between semimodules,ome reasons for believing that no probabilistic measure will ever be able to adequately capture coherence. First, there can be no function whose arguments are nothing but tuples of probabilities, and which assigns different values to pairs of propositions (A, B) and (A, C) if A implies both B and C,

Kinetic

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0383-3 in the content of a set of propositions is positively affected by the coherence of the set, and (ii) that coherence can be characterized in probabilistic terms. There has been a longstanding question of how to construct a measure of coherence. We will show that Bayesian Coherentism cannot rest on a