Titlebook: Cognitive Constraints on Communication; Representations and Lucia Vaina,Jaakko Hintikka Book 1984 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrech

APO

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59742-8tisfaction rules (Cushing, 1977). We then argue that a selection account of discourse interpretation falls right out of the relativized rule, along with an explanation for at least some “conventional implicatures” (Karttunen and Peters, 1979).

Fresco

出沒(méi)

來(lái)自于

Problems in Question Answering,ank’s SAM reads stories and answers questions about what it reads (see Schank et al. 1975). While all of these programs are concerned with question answering, each one has perceived the problem from a different angle.

星星

不朽中國(guó)

和諧

Feedback

Dynamic Model Selection in the Interpretation of Discourse,tisfaction rules (Cushing, 1977). We then argue that a selection account of discourse interpretation falls right out of the relativized rule, along with an explanation for at least some “conventional implicatures” (Karttunen and Peters, 1979).

COWER

0924-4662 only is communication crucial for virtually all interpersonal relations; dialogue is often seen as offering us also a paradigm for important intra-individual processes. The best known example is undoubtedly the idea of concep- tualizing thinking as an internal dialogue, "inward dialogue carried on

Pillory

Population Genetic Effects of Inbreeding,milar, once we recognize the importance of . and, particularly, aspects of thinking concerned with recognizing and suppressing . — ineffective or destructive thought processes. When seen in this light, much humor that at first seems pointless, or mysterious, becomes more understandable.