找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Codification in International Perspective; Selected Papers from Wen-Yeu Wang Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 C

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 閘門
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 23:30:33 | 只看該作者
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 01:16:26 | 只看該作者
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 07:58:12 | 只看該作者
Yu-Wei Huang,Chia-Hao Lee,Fu-Hau Hsuthe issues addressed during the 2012 Taipei Congress, whose general topic was codification. The numerous national reports which were submitted constitute a generous and exciting intellectual crop, on which many interesting lines of reflection can be based..In fact, what their reading make obvious is
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 09:52:37 | 只看該作者
Tai-Siang Huang,Po-Yang Hsiung,Bo-Chao Chengriminal law existed, and still do not in England, Wales and Scotland. This tradition implanted itself first in the colonies, and then in the new union. Criminal law was primarily a matter for the States in exercise of their police power. Only later did a system of federal criminal law develop, roote
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 14:45:39 | 只看該作者
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 18:10:36 | 只看該作者
Daeil Jang,Taeeun Kim,Hwankuk Kimtal rights and freedoms and human rights. The provision stresses that, in addition to ensuring adherence to procedural requirements in connection with fundamental rights, every effort must also be made to ensure that fundamental rights are put into practice in a substantial sense. Under the provisio
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 23:55:02 | 只看該作者
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:32:50 | 只看該作者
Codification of Private Law in Post-Soviet States of the CIS and Georgia is significantly different from the old Soviet one, from both a content and legal drafting standpoint. This article put emphasis on introducing and comparing two models of codification of civil law in CIS countries, namely the Model Civil Code (MCC) system and the Civil Code of Georgia (CCG) system.
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 10:15:40 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4241-0The purpose of this article is to provide insights into the role of codification in a number of countries around the world, based on the author’s experiences in legal education and in law reform. In each case the author looks at the various codifications in the context of the country’s history and its own legal culture.
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 12:59:19 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-9 11:29
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
通化县| 江津市| 广饶县| 汉寿县| 鄂温| 丹巴县| 巫溪县| 宝鸡市| 永丰县| 海宁市| 大兴区| 彰武县| 文化| 米脂县| 保康县| 元江| 江安县| 浠水县| 大庆市| 林周县| 淮滨县| 时尚| 钟山县| 灵石县| 台江县| 辽宁省| 互助| 安仁县| 闸北区| 佛山市| 贺州市| 万宁市| 东源县| 洪雅县| 舒兰市| 北安市| 藁城市| 台湾省| 英吉沙县| 九江县| 信宜市|