找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal; Proceedings of the F Hugo Tristram Engelhardt,Stuart F. Spicker,Bernard Conference proceedings 197

[復制鏈接]
樓主: EVOKE
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 17:23:53 | 只看該作者
The Art and Science of Clinical Judgment: painting, or short story writing. If important questions are supposed to be hard and require considerable care in answering, our initial query does not seem to be one of the central subjects of the philosophy of medicine.
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 22:35:34 | 只看該作者
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 01:01:57 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137468888ing to fall back into the ‘gray’ world of weak probabilistic arguments” (p. 109). Are we to infer, then, that in the world of the clinician truth is doomed to dwindle into insignificance? I cannot believe that this is what Gedye intended, yet this is the moral of de Beauvoir’s remark.
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 03:47:46 | 只看該作者
Andrey Makarychev,Alexandra Yatsyk of Bayes’ well-known theorem as a more plausible approach than other probability techniques for purposes of applying statistical methods to situations of practical belief, decision and practice. As is to be expected, his exposition provides no opportunity for critical comment.
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 07:54:40 | 只看該作者
A Clinician’s Quest for Certaintying to fall back into the ‘gray’ world of weak probabilistic arguments” (p. 109). Are we to infer, then, that in the world of the clinician truth is doomed to dwindle into insignificance? I cannot believe that this is what Gedye intended, yet this is the moral of de Beauvoir’s remark.
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 12:22:21 | 只看該作者
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 19:14:02 | 只看該作者
Classification and Its Alternativeses of epistemology is prompted because I have found repeatedly that the received questions which I have attempted to explore scientifically prove to be obscure or even meaningless; and in order to get back on the proper road of inquiry it is necessary perhaps to restate the fundamental problems.
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 19:52:33 | 只看該作者
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 01:46:50 | 只看該作者
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 04:22:52 | 只看該作者
The Stalemate in EU-Russia Relationses of epistemology is prompted because I have found repeatedly that the received questions which I have attempted to explore scientifically prove to be obscure or even meaningless; and in order to get back on the proper road of inquiry it is necessary perhaps to restate the fundamental problems.
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 10:58
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
大悟县| 宜兰市| 海晏县| 武乡县| 景宁| 屏山县| 大庆市| 孟连| 丰原市| 海林市| 杂多县| 鄄城县| 嘉峪关市| 兰坪| 临夏市| 陈巴尔虎旗| 厦门市| 澎湖县| 尤溪县| 洛南县| 清新县| 汶上县| 临泉县| 兴山县| 文成县| 鄱阳县| 博客| 安义县| 乌兰察布市| 赫章县| 应城市| 宕昌县| 平江县| 昭平县| 莱西市| 柳江县| 萍乡市| 柘荣县| 泸西县| 固原市| 曲沃县|