Titlebook: Civilizational Dialogue and World Order; The Other Politics o Michális S. Michael (Research Fellow in the Centre Book 2009 Michális S. Mich

深陷

RLS898

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-85042-3ran, Mohammad Khatami, which designated 2001 as the Year of the “Dialogue among Civilizations.” In the same year, on September 11, the shadow of a future clash of civilizations came looming down with incredible velocity, leaving in its wake an atmosphere of fear, mistrust, and war. At the dawn of th

Asseverate

有害處

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19434-9 political sphere at the global level. Traditional political canons anchored in the nation-state and its domestic jurisdiction are increasingly perceived as insufficient, or indeed, self-defeating, in a world where socioeconomical interaction is, to a significant degree, interdependent and multilaye

大罵

要素

Eigenregulation und Selbsthilfemarck: “To jaw jaw is always better than to war war.”. (We could argue, of course, about how much either man actually lived by it.) Where the rub sets in is that dialogue has been hauled into the service of quite different objectives. It is therefore necessary to think along the lines of “horses for

頂點(diǎn)

miracle

Die Individualit?t des Patientenited and exploited and the elements of self-destruction built into a hegemonic system. Keeping in mind Baudrillard’s warning, I shall focus on the rage of those whofeel they have been deceived by the present global system and have nofuture within it. This feeling has acquired an ominous edge in rece

慷慨援助

Xanthine Calculi and Xanthinuria,tion in our daily routine, but the dialogue among civilizations that helps establish the very condition of the contemporary world in which people live their lives. The particular urgency of such dialogues can be felt as soon as we look around and take notice of the many instances of conflict, violen

虛弱

Xanthine Calculi and Xanthinuria,onstruct the field of tension where European and Islamic civilizations have interacted—a field where the cultural and the political levels are intersected. It is my goal to link culture to power. The field of tension is given by how power is culturally defined and how culture becomes a yardstick for