找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Citizens‘ Reactions to European Integration Compared; Overlooking Europe Sophie Duchesne,Elizabeth Frazer,Virginie Ingelgom Book 2013 Palgr

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 38573|回復(fù): 45
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:42:04 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Citizens‘ Reactions to European Integration Compared
副標(biāo)題Overlooking Europe
編輯Sophie Duchesne,Elizabeth Frazer,Virginie Ingelgom
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/227/226790/226790.mp4
圖書封面Titlebook: Citizens‘ Reactions to European Integration Compared; Overlooking Europe Sophie Duchesne,Elizabeth Frazer,Virginie Ingelgom Book 2013 Palgr
描述Pre-financial crisis, EU citizens were ‘overlooking‘ Europe ignoring it in favour of globalisation, economic flows, and crises of political corruption. Innovative focus group methods allow an analysis of citizens‘ reactions, and demonstrate how euroscepticism is a red herring, instead articulating an indifference to and ambivalence about Europe.
出版日期Book 2013
關(guān)鍵詞corruption; desegregation; European Integration; European Union (EU); globalization; methods
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297266
isbn_softcover978-1-349-34640-0
isbn_ebook978-1-137-29726-6
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Citizens‘ Reactions to European Integration Compared影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Citizens‘ Reactions to European Integration Compared影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Citizens‘ Reactions to European Integration Compared網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Citizens‘ Reactions to European Integration Compared網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Citizens‘ Reactions to European Integration Compared被引頻次




書目名稱Citizens‘ Reactions to European Integration Compared被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Citizens‘ Reactions to European Integration Compared年度引用




書目名稱Citizens‘ Reactions to European Integration Compared年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Citizens‘ Reactions to European Integration Compared讀者反饋




書目名稱Citizens‘ Reactions to European Integration Compared讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:20:15 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:59:17 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:15:11 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:14:13 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:20:30 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:05:42 | 只看該作者
Reflections on Design and Implementation,its implementation. So, we have decided to dedicate a whole chapter to methodological issues. More particularly, we aim to discuss, and we hope to cast light on, a recurring difficulty of cross-national qualitative methodology: the comparability of the data on which the analysis is based.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:45:01 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:53:08 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:50:02 | 只看該作者
corruption. Innovative focus group methods allow an analysis of citizens‘ reactions, and demonstrate how euroscepticism is a red herring, instead articulating an indifference to and ambivalence about Europe.978-1-349-34640-0978-1-137-29726-6
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-16 07:10
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
武乡县| 甘泉县| 甘德县| 阜新市| 呼伦贝尔市| 册亨县| 遵义县| 新蔡县| 边坝县| 苗栗市| 林芝县| 平和县| 乌拉特后旗| 大厂| 陆丰市| 海兴县| 新源县| 河南省| 泗阳县| 五峰| 高邮市| 汨罗市| 车致| 沐川县| 元江| 肥东县| 宜君县| 朝阳市| 鸡西市| 鹤庆县| 蓬安县| 绥芬河市| 高陵县| 辉县市| 长治县| 喀喇沁旗| 饶平县| 巩义市| 乌恰县| 涟源市| 九台市|