找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives; Ruth Lister,Jo Campling Textbook 2003Latest edition The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 20

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 適婚女孩
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 06:22:20 | 只看該作者
Women’s Political Citizenship: Different and Equal is it to promote . by challenging the conditions, in both private and public spheres, that curtail women’s rights and opportunities as political citizens? Alternatively, following the theoretical position I have outlined, is it possible to promote women’s political citizenship by developing policies and practices that draw on both approaches?
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 10:42:43 | 只看該作者
What is Citizenship?hip?’ in two ways. First, it reviews the main elements that constitute the language of citizenship and that, in different combinations, provide the ingredients of the various definitions attempted in the literature — academic and political. Second, it discusses the main ways in which the concept is
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 12:51:10 | 只看該作者
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 17:16:08 | 只看該作者
Beyond Dichotomywithin the pluralist framework developed in the previous chapter. It argues that such a synthesis opens up the possibility of a woman-friendly, ‘gender-inclusive’ model of citizenship and that this should be our goal.
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 23:12:42 | 只看該作者
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 03:43:55 | 只看該作者
Conclusion: Towards a Feminist Theory and Praxis of Citizenship its exclusionary and disciplinary tendencies. Citizenship, I believe, provides an invaluable strategic theoretical concept for the analysis of women’s subordination and a potentially powerful political weapon in the struggle against it. Moreover, it throws a searching light on difference, despite i
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 06:42:51 | 只看該作者
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 11:04:00 | 只看該作者
Reliability Metrics Formulation, 30). While attempts to elaborate such a conception demonstrate the difficulties, I will argue that this is the direction citizenship theory has to take, in relation to citizenship both as a status and a practice, if it is to match up to its inclusionary and universalist claims. Thus, rejecting the
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 16:05:55 | 只看該作者
Reliability Metrics Formulation,within the pluralist framework developed in the previous chapter. It argues that such a synthesis opens up the possibility of a woman-friendly, ‘gender-inclusive’ model of citizenship and that this should be our goal.
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 19:26:09 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-12 13:26
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
涟水县| 泰州市| 府谷县| 昭觉县| 杂多县| 依安县| 兴安盟| 靖江市| 寿阳县| 双江| 浦东新区| 什邡市| 揭东县| 多伦县| 吴旗县| 宝鸡市| 博客| 涡阳县| 金华市| 平昌县| 保定市| 万盛区| 南郑县| 迁西县| 霸州市| 称多县| 连平县| 太保市| 濮阳市| 饶平县| 进贤县| 盘锦市| 两当县| 察哈| 中阳县| 平潭县| 宣恩县| 上栗县| 谷城县| 漳州市| 岗巴县|