Titlebook: Cinema after Fascism; The Shattered Screen Siobhan S. Craig Book 2010 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2010 cinema.Eur

Inoculare

書目名稱Cinema after Fascism影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Cinema after Fascism影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Cinema after Fascism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書目名稱Cinema after Fascism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Cinema after Fascism被引頻次




書目名稱Cinema after Fascism被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Cinema after Fascism年度引用




書目名稱Cinema after Fascism年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Cinema after Fascism讀者反饋




書目名稱Cinema after Fascism讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

薄膜

Region-Building in North Africathe traces of the past. All three directors repeatedly confront us with a visual summary of what has been lost and of the ad hoc quality of new constructions in these landscapes of destruction. Like Rossellini, Wilder and Reed focus their films on a confrontation between the fascist culture that now

不能和解

Cross-Border Interactions and Regionalismon is glimpsed only briefly, presents, like the overtly visible ruins of Rossellini’s ., an insistent question: how does postwar Italy rebuild, relive, renarrate, and recinematize the Italy of Mussolini? Rather than the rubble we see in Rossellini’s film and in Helma Sanders-Brahms’ ., or the traces

Delirium

The Finnish Integrated Acidification Models he examines the persistence of structures of desire and power. To this damaged historiography is added the ruination of desire and spectatorship. The subject is constituted both as a phantasm of spectacle (a creature of smoke and mirrors) and as an obsessive spectator, with scopophilia as the ruli

外形

Willem de Vries,Maximilian Posch,Juha K?m?riolocaust film spectator must negotiate. My discussion in . has focused detailed attention on a few films, attempting both to engage them closely on a textual level and to situate them in dialogue with each other and with a complex spectrum of ideological, historiographic, or aesthetic discourses. In

Abrade

Introduction,o reconfigure the idioms of cinema, ranging from the ambivalently postfascist neorealism of Roberto Rossellini to the “neomelodramas” of Rainer Werner Fassbinder, remain highly precarious. These new cinematic languages are never fully naturalized: the joists and scaffolding remain visible and indeed

Abrade

The Ghost in the Rubble,the traces of the past. All three directors repeatedly confront us with a visual summary of what has been lost and of the ad hoc quality of new constructions in these landscapes of destruction. Like Rossellini, Wilder and Reed focus their films on a confrontation between the fascist culture that now

頌揚(yáng)國(guó)家

The Web of Spectacle,on is glimpsed only briefly, presents, like the overtly visible ruins of Rossellini’s ., an insistent question: how does postwar Italy rebuild, relive, renarrate, and recinematize the Italy of Mussolini? Rather than the rubble we see in Rossellini’s film and in Helma Sanders-Brahms’ ., or the traces

indignant

The Passion of Veronika Voss,s he examines the persistence of structures of desire and power. To this damaged historiography is added the ruination of desire and spectatorship. The subject is constituted both as a phantasm of spectacle (a creature of smoke and mirrors) and as an obsessive spectator, with scopophilia as the ruli

發(fā)炎