找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Christian Zionism and English National Identity, 1600–1850; Andrew Crome Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 Ch

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Diverticulum
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 04:46:41 | 只看該作者
Foreign Administrative Acts: General Report,ough cautious in proposing wider applications of its historically contingent findings, it suggests the possible application of this book’s theoretical approach to other national manifestations of Christian Zionism, particularly in the United States.
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 11:34:32 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 14:03:40 | 只看該作者
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 16:44:54 | 只看該作者
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 23:22:47 | 只看該作者
,“See with Your Own Eyes, and Believe Your Bibles”: The Jew Bill Controversy of 1753,violent and disloyal, and suggested that if naturalised, they would use England as a staging ground for their conquest of Palestine. For supporters of the Act, naturalisation offered England a unique opportunity to fulfil prophecy and restore the Jews to Palestine.
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 00:35:18 | 只看該作者
Introduction,sed through a modified version of Bauman’s concept of allosemitism. It suggests an eschatological “point of encounter” in which self and other momentarily cross paths. The introduction ends by suggesting a five-point framework for understanding Christian Zionism and “chosen” national identity.
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 07:56:17 | 只看該作者
,“Shall They Return to Jerusalem Againe?”: Jewish Restoration in Early Modern English Thought,estine and England’s national role, such as Thomas Brightman, Henry Finch, and Joseph Mede. The emergence of these beliefs is explored through hermeneutical changes and developing ideas of English nationhood.
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 11:30:12 | 只看該作者
,“Ignorance, Infatuation, and, Perhaps, Insanity!”: Jewish Restoration and National Crisis, 1793–179f the English were “hidden Jews” is explored as a dynamic “point of encounter” between self and other. The chapter suggests that Brothers’s use of these ideas fits into the same logical framework as restorationist positions discussed in earlier chapters.
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 15:33:11 | 只看該作者
,“Direct the Eyes of the Jews to England”: The Jerusalem Bishopric Controversy, 1840–1841,on examines the controversy surrounding the establishment of the Jerusalem bishopric. In particular, it examines the interplay between prophecy, politics, and providence in the work of supporters in the London Society and Lord Ashley.
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 19:35:22 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 17:42
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
海原县| 乐安县| 高邑县| 平和县| 繁峙县| 泽普县| 平阴县| 三亚市| 河东区| 邳州市| 铜山县| 出国| 灵宝市| 台北县| 南郑县| 通海县| 商城县| 吉林市| 南昌县| 绩溪县| 苍梧县| 惠来县| 大悟县| 巴彦县| 庆城县| 镇远县| 安义县| 太白县| 增城市| 东阳市| 新源县| 台山市| 陆良县| 寿宁县| 日土县| 江城| 江都市| 鄂州市| 吉木乃县| 文登市| 永平县|