找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Christian Zionism and English National Identity, 1600–1850; Andrew Crome Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 Ch

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Diverticulum
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 04:46:41 | 只看該作者
Foreign Administrative Acts: General Report,ough cautious in proposing wider applications of its historically contingent findings, it suggests the possible application of this book’s theoretical approach to other national manifestations of Christian Zionism, particularly in the United States.
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 11:34:32 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 14:03:40 | 只看該作者
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 16:44:54 | 只看該作者
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 23:22:47 | 只看該作者
,“See with Your Own Eyes, and Believe Your Bibles”: The Jew Bill Controversy of 1753,violent and disloyal, and suggested that if naturalised, they would use England as a staging ground for their conquest of Palestine. For supporters of the Act, naturalisation offered England a unique opportunity to fulfil prophecy and restore the Jews to Palestine.
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 00:35:18 | 只看該作者
Introduction,sed through a modified version of Bauman’s concept of allosemitism. It suggests an eschatological “point of encounter” in which self and other momentarily cross paths. The introduction ends by suggesting a five-point framework for understanding Christian Zionism and “chosen” national identity.
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 07:56:17 | 只看該作者
,“Shall They Return to Jerusalem Againe?”: Jewish Restoration in Early Modern English Thought,estine and England’s national role, such as Thomas Brightman, Henry Finch, and Joseph Mede. The emergence of these beliefs is explored through hermeneutical changes and developing ideas of English nationhood.
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 11:30:12 | 只看該作者
,“Ignorance, Infatuation, and, Perhaps, Insanity!”: Jewish Restoration and National Crisis, 1793–179f the English were “hidden Jews” is explored as a dynamic “point of encounter” between self and other. The chapter suggests that Brothers’s use of these ideas fits into the same logical framework as restorationist positions discussed in earlier chapters.
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 15:33:11 | 只看該作者
,“Direct the Eyes of the Jews to England”: The Jerusalem Bishopric Controversy, 1840–1841,on examines the controversy surrounding the establishment of the Jerusalem bishopric. In particular, it examines the interplay between prophecy, politics, and providence in the work of supporters in the London Society and Lord Ashley.
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 19:35:22 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 22:00
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
湖南省| 巨鹿县| 温泉县| 渝北区| 陆丰市| 东阳市| 益阳市| 富锦市| 武川县| 吉隆县| 进贤县| 德化县| 霸州市| 尉犁县| 新乡县| 泗水县| 社会| 河源市| 合水县| 谢通门县| 玉林市| 万荣县| 县级市| 马鞍山市| 玛纳斯县| 永济市| 贺兰县| 朝阳市| 南澳县| 改则县| 陵川县| 邵武市| 澄城县| 昂仁县| 岚皋县| 渝北区| 鄂州市| 秦安县| 建阳市| 赣榆县| 湖北省|