找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Choosing a Leader; Party Leadership Con Leonard P. Stark Book 1996 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1996 Affe

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 24189|回復(fù): 45
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:49:45 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Choosing a Leader
副標(biāo)題Party Leadership Con
編輯Leonard P. Stark
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/227/226179/226179.mp4
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Choosing a Leader; Party Leadership Con Leonard P. Stark Book 1996 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1996 Affe
描述This fascinating study contains important new information and original insights into a poorly-understood political phenomenon: contests for party leadership. It describes, in far greater detail than has appeared before, the frequently bitter struggles over leadership selection which have plagued the Conservative, Labour, Liberal, Social Democratic, and Liberal Democrat parties. Based on extensive interviewing with former party leaders, and careful analysis of leadership contests in each party, the book concludes that leadership selection rules rarely affect who stands for party leadership or who wins the contests.
出版日期Book 1996
關(guān)鍵詞Affect; campaign; information; interview; British Politics
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9780230375758
isbn_softcover978-0-333-65336-4
isbn_ebook978-0-230-37575-8
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1996
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Choosing a Leader影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Choosing a Leader影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Choosing a Leader網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Choosing a Leader網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Choosing a Leader被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Choosing a Leader被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Choosing a Leader年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Choosing a Leader年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Choosing a Leader讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Choosing a Leader讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶(hù)組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:26:00 | 只看該作者
party leadership. It describes, in far greater detail than has appeared before, the frequently bitter struggles over leadership selection which have plagued the Conservative, Labour, Liberal, Social Democratic, and Liberal Democrat parties. Based on extensive interviewing with former party leaders,
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:07:11 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:54:24 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39514-7onservative Party leadership lay in his resigning the office and forcing an immediate leadership contest. Major’s action, and the events of the 1995 contest, provide further support for many of the conclusions presented in previous chapters.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:54:35 | 只看該作者
Third Parties,iance, cooperating in many respects (most notably by refraining from putting their parliamentary candidates up against one another) while retaining their distinct identities, policies, and officials. A 1988 merger created the Liberal Democrats.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:34:34 | 只看該作者
Postscript: Put Up , Shut Up,onservative Party leadership lay in his resigning the office and forcing an immediate leadership contest. Major’s action, and the events of the 1995 contest, provide further support for many of the conclusions presented in previous chapters.
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:22:34 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:22:48 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15846-0lished procedure, the Labour Party’s 248 Members of Parliament (MPs) chose Harold Wilson to succeed Gaitskell. The process by which the Conservative leadership passed to Lord Home was far more amorphous. To this day, no one is entirely sure who chose Home to be Macmillan’s successor.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:56:16 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39514-7hat Major led the Conservatives to a fourth consecutive general election victory — a victory that, in all likelihood, would have eluded Thatcher. All of this was accomplished during Major’s first 18 months in the leadership.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:24:03 | 只看該作者
Introduction,lished procedure, the Labour Party’s 248 Members of Parliament (MPs) chose Harold Wilson to succeed Gaitskell. The process by which the Conservative leadership passed to Lord Home was far more amorphous. To this day, no one is entirely sure who chose Home to be Macmillan’s successor.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-16 18:26
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
志丹县| 当雄县| 汉中市| 丹凤县| 辽源市| 云林县| 南木林县| 孟津县| 沅陵县| 黄龙县| 宜川县| 凤庆县| 隆德县| 康保县| 柘荣县| 成都市| 巫山县| 德安县| 吉水县| 阜南县| 洛阳市| 天镇县| 克拉玛依市| 辛集市| 临城县| 金堂县| 盐山县| 马尔康县| 县级市| 彰化市| 剑阁县| 大宁县| 崇仁县| 门头沟区| 全州县| 汾阳市| 汪清县| 泗水县| 成都市| 林州市| 乌鲁木齐县|