找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Chinese Maritime Cases; Selection for Year o Martin Davies,Jiang Lin Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 抵押證書
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 23:06:34 | 只看該作者
Stochastic Policy Iteration Methods two others, Zhejiang Jiaolong Group Co., Ltd. and Chenye Shipbuilding Co., Ltd., for breach of contract. Plaintiff entered into two Floating Capital Loan Contracts with CEIEC Ningbo for RMB 77 million and RMB 40 million plus interest, respectively.
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 02:26:25 | 只看該作者
Denis Belomestny,John Schoenmakersendant initially paid 180,000 USD to the Plaintiff, and disputed its liability to pay the remaining 896,078.75 USD, arguing that the cost was excessive. The court rejected the Defendant’s evidence that the cost of repairs was excessive and found for the Plaintiff.
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 05:59:44 | 只看該作者
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 11:33:30 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13093-1intiff filed suit for the realization (foreclosure) of the ship’s mortgage, and asked the court to compel auction or sale of the vessel in order to repay the Defendant’s outstanding debts, and to give the Plaintiff priority over other claims in repayment from the proceeds of sale.
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 14:54:02 | 只看該作者
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 19:20:42 | 只看該作者
Sukhpreet Kaur,Yogesh Kumar,Sushil Kumaro the Defendant carrier’s ship in Brazil was alleged to be lacking in weight upon delivery in Shanghai. The Defendant argued that the difference in weight, as measured in wet metric tons, was due to the quality of the iron ore, which naturally drained off water weight during the voyage to Shanghai.
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 01:54:57 | 只看該作者
Problems in Bending of Bars and Plates,the Defendant’s ship after it had been struck while at anchor by another ship. The Plaintiff sought to recover 5% of the cargo losses from the Defendant, on the basis that this was the Defendant’s share of responsibility for the sinking. The Plaintiff argued that the Defendant had overloaded the shi
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 05:19:29 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 09:08:16 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22359-4 repair costs and lost wages, from a collision that occurred on May 18, 2010 against the Defendant, Offshore Oil Engineering Co., Ltd. In response, Offshore Oil argued that some of the repairs made by the Plaintiff in South Africa were unreasonable, and could have been done for a much lower rate in
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 14:19:05 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 16:45
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
许昌县| 巩留县| 平阴县| 明水县| 巴马| 夏河县| 石狮市| 云安县| 新巴尔虎左旗| 桃园市| 兰州市| 高淳县| 林周县| 平凉市| 丁青县| 天柱县| 车险| 鲁甸县| 冕宁县| 龙江县| 华池县| 廉江市| 襄汾县| 安康市| 潮州市| 巴林左旗| 碌曲县| 五河县| 泸州市| 兰溪市| 乡城县| 元谋县| 长子县| 鱼台县| 东乡族自治县| 昌乐县| 樟树市| 鄢陵县| 乐昌市| 工布江达县| 梨树县|