Titlebook: Chinese Maritime Cases; Selection for Year o Martin Davies,Jiang Lin Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu

Banister

內(nèi)疚

TEN

Hiatus

植物茂盛

Bo Fu Company (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. v. Top Logic International Limited,endant initially paid 180,000 USD to the Plaintiff, and disputed its liability to pay the remaining 896,078.75 USD, arguing that the cost was excessive. The court rejected the Defendant’s evidence that the cost of repairs was excessive and found for the Plaintiff.

違抗

玩忽職守

conscience

lymphoma

China Pacific Insurance Co., Ltd. Shipping Insurance Operation Center v. Teh May Maritime Corporateo the Defendant carrier’s ship in Brazil was alleged to be lacking in weight upon delivery in Shanghai. The Defendant argued that the difference in weight, as measured in wet metric tons, was due to the quality of the iron ore, which naturally drained off water weight during the voyage to Shanghai.

spinal-stenosis