Titlebook: China’s Urban Construction Land Development; The State, Market, a Tao Liu Book 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020 Formal and info

MINT

Whiteness and “the Imperial Turn”This chapter concluded the whole study, summarized the main findings, answered the general questions asked in the beginning of this book, discussed the major theoretical and practical implications, and enumerated the limitation of this study along with the suggested directions for future research.

Terrace

integrated

放縱

theirrural land for urban uses in informal markets.?.??.Further, based on an investigation of UCL development in Beijing and Shenzhen, it shows an interesting trajectory in which the uneven growth and utilizati978-981-15-0567-6978-981-15-0565-2

deciduous

Re-Orientalism and Indian Writing in English alleviate the increasing fiscal pressures after the tax-sharing reform by gaining extra-budgetary land sale revenue, and to promote urban economic growth by using low-priced industrial land as an important means to attract domestic and foreign investments. Third, some studies from the neoliberal pe

intolerance

,“Reverse Orientalism” and Whimsy,ion, the changing role of institutions in urban and regional development, and their embeddedness in the regionally specific development milieu, which is especially significant in understanding UCL development in China with a vast territory. These theoretical frameworks emphasize the power distributi

緊張過度

,“Reverse Orientalism” and Whimsy,santry partnerships are defined in this chapter. Competitive partnership exists in formal land development where agreement is achieved through a zero-sum game between local states and peasants sharing a certain amount of land appreciation. Collaborative partnership exists in informal land developmen

IDEAS

現(xiàn)任者

Re-Orientalism and Indian Writing in English administrative system unlike its counterpart. Chinese cities are classified into five groups based on their scale, speed, and the dominant approach of UCL development. The case cities, Beijing and Shenzhen, are classified into two types that represent rapid and large-scale UCL development by formal

托運(yùn)

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101289mented by local states, which possess overwhelming power over UCL development and have their own fiscal and development interests. The varied local implementations of these central policies has resulted in spatially uneven landscapes of compensation to lost-land peasants and marketization levels of