Titlebook: China‘s Resource Diplomacy in Africa; Powering Development Marcus Power,Giles Mohan,May Tan-Mullins Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a divisio

聯(lián)系

書目名稱China‘s Resource Diplomacy in Africa影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱China‘s Resource Diplomacy in Africa影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱China‘s Resource Diplomacy in Africa網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱China‘s Resource Diplomacy in Africa網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱China‘s Resource Diplomacy in Africa被引頻次




書目名稱China‘s Resource Diplomacy in Africa被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱China‘s Resource Diplomacy in Africa年度引用




書目名稱China‘s Resource Diplomacy in Africa年度引用學科排名




書目名稱China‘s Resource Diplomacy in Africa讀者反饋




書目名稱China‘s Resource Diplomacy in Africa讀者反饋學科排名

拋物線

,Contextualizing China—Africa Relations,ical connections between China and Africa run deep and that contemporary China-Africa engagement builds on a longer history of cooperation and interaction. It is as if China’s interest in Africa is somehow ‘new’ and sudden, purely opportunistic or that it has come from nowhere. Yet China has long ha

SENT

小畫像

,Towards a Chinese ‘Socialist Market Economy’,’s economic transformation first began. In August 1980 Shenzhen became the first area in China to be designated an SEZ that could accept foreign investment under Deng’s reforms. The site of a former fishing village on the border with Hong Kong, the Shenzhen SEZ has since evolved into a thriving metr

中和

Cpap155

Cpap155

監(jiān)禁

蝕刻

,Changing Contexts and the Future of China—Africa Relations,hrust the nature of China’s involvement in Africa into the global media spotlight again. Criticizing both China’s domestic and overseas capitalist practices, these western politicians reiterated the inability of the Chinese political and economic model to meet the global norms around good governance

輕浮思想

Versuchsergebnisse und Diskussion,chens, writing in the United Kingdom’s .:.Similar sentiments were expressed in many other leading international newspapers (see, e.g. . 13 March 2008) where China’s moves were treated as cynical and self-serving. This zeitgeist is part of a broader concern, expressed in popular culture, about China’