找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: China’s Grain for Green Program; A Review of the Larg Claudio O. Delang,Zhen Yuan Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 和尚吃肉片
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 18:30:26 | 只看該作者
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 19:32:22 | 只看該作者
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 23:55:16 | 只看該作者
Einleitung und Gang der Untersuchung,crease in grain prices, was more likely due to the loss of farmland caused by urbanization in the eastern provinces (where the Grain for Green was not implemented), as well as the shift from grain production to the production of other crops.
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 03:39:06 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9998-6chers agree that economic trees bring higher profits to the farmers, but even among economic trees, not all trees bring profits comparable to crops, once the subsidies are excluded from the calculation. Most researchers have looked at the benefits per hectare rather than the benefits per person-day.
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 10:11:34 | 只看該作者
China’s Reforestation and Rural Development Programsn provinces was reaching a critical point. The Grain for Green in particular addressed all these problems concurrently, through direct payments to poor farmers willing to set aside marginal land. Partly for this reason, the Grain for Green is considered by many as the best reforestation and rural development program ever undertaken in China.
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 14:57:50 | 只看該作者
Impact on Grain Output and Pricecrease in grain prices, was more likely due to the loss of farmland caused by urbanization in the eastern provinces (where the Grain for Green was not implemented), as well as the shift from grain production to the production of other crops.
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 18:46:57 | 只看該作者
Participants’ Income Levelschers agree that economic trees bring higher profits to the farmers, but even among economic trees, not all trees bring profits comparable to crops, once the subsidies are excluded from the calculation. Most researchers have looked at the benefits per hectare rather than the benefits per person-day.
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 21:14:07 | 只看該作者
Management of Forest Resources from 1949 to 1998Until 1949 there was not even a Ministry of Forestry, with the forests being managed by the Ministry of Agriculture. The communist government did try to use forests more rationally, by instituting the first national-level Ministry of Forestry (MOF). However, the MOF was not able to manage the forest
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 02:05:27 | 只看該作者
China’s Reforestation and Rural Development Programser 97 % of China’s counties and target over 100 million ha of land for forestation. The Grain for Green is the largest of these programs, in terms of area covered, people affected, and money invested. This book only reviews the Grain for Green, but in many villages more than one program was introduc
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 04:48:19 | 只看該作者
Program Timelinees – Sichuan, Shaanxi and Gansu – in 1999. In particular, the Grain for Green was slowed down after 2003 because of fear (later found to be unfounded) over the impact that the Grain for Green had had on food supply, and because more land had been converted over the previous 2–3 years than originally
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-27 09:35
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
英超| 泽普县| 台北市| 双牌县| 武夷山市| 黄骅市| 海城市| 曲周县| 思茅市| 阿巴嘎旗| 齐河县| 湘乡市| 通城县| 德钦县| 曲水县| 信阳市| 屏山县| 鄂托克前旗| 昭苏县| 边坝县| 合阳县| 长沙县| 英吉沙县| 新建县| 重庆市| 镇康县| 高密市| 东丽区| 麟游县| 黄山市| 云梦县| 湘阴县| 贵港市| 长岛县| 顺昌县| 崇阳县| 海淀区| 商南县| 探索| 望谟县| 汾阳市|