Titlebook: China as a Double-Bind Regulatory State; How Internet Regulat Aifang Ma Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under ex

GERD847

書目名稱China as a Double-Bind Regulatory State影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱China as a Double-Bind Regulatory State影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱China as a Double-Bind Regulatory State網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱China as a Double-Bind Regulatory State網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱China as a Double-Bind Regulatory State被引頻次




書目名稱China as a Double-Bind Regulatory State被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱China as a Double-Bind Regulatory State年度引用




書目名稱China as a Double-Bind Regulatory State年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱China as a Double-Bind Regulatory State讀者反饋




書目名稱China as a Double-Bind Regulatory State讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

尊敬

A Conceptual Scheme for the Double-Bind Regulatory State,state power, contradiction in the regulatory objectives, and fragmented authoritarianism. It starts with a critical review of the?existing regulatory approaches and discusses their weaknesses in?explaining the regulatory practices in contemporary China. It introduces the theory of Michael Mann on th

custody

Particularities of the Economic Regulation of the ISM Industry, analysed. First, the development of the ISM sector is a government-piloted process in China. Different from the USA where private actors quickly replaced the state to spearhead the internet development, the Chinese party-state dominated the initial strides of the internet development. It nurtured a

公豬

BILK

搖擺

The Dynamics of Fragmented Authoritarianism, entails two dynamics: vertical fragmentation and horizontal fragmentation. They respectively open margins of manoeuvring of private ISM firms in the economic and political regulation. On the economic axis, the party-state’s authority over firms is weakened by the inclusion of local regulators into

搖擺

Global Leadership Comes at a Price,eeking global leadership. As China is reaching the centre of the global stage more than ever before, the pressure of the international public opinion matters for pushing China to behave in a less authoritarian manner, including in the field of the information control. The party-state has tried to mi

Outshine

The Double-Bind Regulation Beyond China,either rule as an arbitrary autocrat nor as a rule-abiding democrat, it must muddle through regime-friendly objectives (RFOs) and society-friendly objectives (SFOs) and scrupulously control the intensity of authoritarianism to avoid being swallowed by it. Its constant navigation between SFOs and RFO

BAN

DEMUR