Titlebook: Characters of Women in Narrative Literature; Keith M. May Book 1981 Keith M. May 1981 English literature.literature.Narrative.women

選民

書目名稱Characters of Women in Narrative Literature影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Characters of Women in Narrative Literature影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Characters of Women in Narrative Literature網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Characters of Women in Narrative Literature網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Characters of Women in Narrative Literature被引頻次




書目名稱Characters of Women in Narrative Literature被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Characters of Women in Narrative Literature年度引用




書目名稱Characters of Women in Narrative Literature年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Characters of Women in Narrative Literature讀者反饋




書目名稱Characters of Women in Narrative Literature讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

MILL

The Later Nineteenth Century,writing fiction was that fiction could supremely strengthen the reader’s capacity for fellow-feelings. Truth to life was relatively important — as a means of educating the moral imagination. Henry James thought that the writing of fiction should itself be a moral enterprise and . an aesthetic one.

人充滿活力

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16626-8English literature; literature; Narrative; women

Indecisive

attenuate

Insensate

Insensate

Markt und Bedeutung von LBOs und CBOs,e thought that men and women were alike, except that women had livelier minds and potentially better abilities. Richardson also regarded men and women as ‘brothers and sisters’, as he put it, akin but for circumstances and education. He however relished certain social and sexual roles which through

不再流行

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1784-4 seems to have regarded men and women as ‘brothers and sisters’, since this assumption is implicit in her fiction. The signs suggest that she thought of women overwhelmingly in respect of their social situation and scarcely at all in terms of some differentiated psychological make-up. Despite her fi

antecedence

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1784-4uestions) or, at the opposite extreme, take as the starting-point for a fascinating, important and necessarily inconclusive discussion. What is not possible is to employ the term literally and so assume, for instance, that Flaubert, George Eliot, Tolstoy and Henry James — the authors under considera

者變

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1784-4f Elena Nikolayevna, the heroine who, as he later wrote, ‘was then still a new type’. It seems that Turgenev had noticed in Russia an interesting and as yet rare phenomenon: the emergence of women in search of a destiny that should transcend, though not necessarily replace, the domestic round.