找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Casualties of Causality; Peter Dahler-Larsen Book 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 Resea

[復制鏈接]
樓主: BRISK
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 12:07:49 | 只看該作者
Twenty-five Questions,de: Is causation the most important and honorable task in the social sciences? Is causality only one thing? Will social science cleanse itself of ideology and normativity, if it restricts itself to causal analysis? Does causation always require a counterfactual? Can you sell your study by pretending
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:03:41 | 只看該作者
Casualties of Causality and Paths to the Future,e Causality Syndrome include lack of truthfulness about details, which constitute threats to the validity of causal claims. Another problem is lack of attention to what exactly constitutes the difference between an intervention group and a control group. In a broader perspective, a too strong focus
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 18:06:06 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:18:51 | 只看該作者
Sound Wave Reflection from the Ocean Floor,logy and normativity, if it restricts itself to causal analysis? Does causation always require a counterfactual? Can you sell your study by pretending that its design is better than it actually is? Well-reflected answers to these questions may lead to a revision of one’s position vis-à-vis The Causality Syndrome.
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 04:21:47 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 07:41:53 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 11:46:24 | 只看該作者
Casualties of Causality and Paths to the Future, attention to what exactly constitutes the difference between an intervention group and a control group. In a broader perspective, a too strong focus on causation may lead to a bias in the selection of topics for research. The chapter suggests three paths to the future.
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 17:34:22 | 只看該作者
Book 2022 causal studies as more important than other studies, a narrow definition of causality, and rules of thumb regarding how to make causal claims. The book argues that the present dominance of this syndrome has considerable downsides and presents a challenge to social science. The book dissects the man
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:53:24 | 只看該作者
The Causality Syndrome,f thought and controversy between the positions. However, when fast and less reflexive thinking reigns, then monism, usurpation, simplification and institutionalization lead to the present dominance of The Causality Syndrome.
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 01:59:55 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 23:24
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
米林县| 沐川县| 建始县| 基隆市| 英超| 平塘县| 苗栗县| 罗甸县| 长葛市| 晋江市| 双城市| 历史| 福贡县| 连江县| 罗平县| 邵武市| 南澳县| 离岛区| 桦南县| 进贤县| 邵阳市| 玉门市| 友谊县| 渝中区| 四平市| 崇仁县| 乐昌市| 漳州市| 上犹县| 巴塘县| 定襄县| 徐汇区| 太和县| 湛江市| 察雅县| 新宾| 中阳县| 涿州市| 霍山县| 吕梁市| 海原县|