找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Casualties of Causality; Peter Dahler-Larsen Book 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 Resea

[復制鏈接]
樓主: BRISK
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 12:07:49 | 只看該作者
Twenty-five Questions,de: Is causation the most important and honorable task in the social sciences? Is causality only one thing? Will social science cleanse itself of ideology and normativity, if it restricts itself to causal analysis? Does causation always require a counterfactual? Can you sell your study by pretending
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:03:41 | 只看該作者
Casualties of Causality and Paths to the Future,e Causality Syndrome include lack of truthfulness about details, which constitute threats to the validity of causal claims. Another problem is lack of attention to what exactly constitutes the difference between an intervention group and a control group. In a broader perspective, a too strong focus
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 18:06:06 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:18:51 | 只看該作者
Sound Wave Reflection from the Ocean Floor,logy and normativity, if it restricts itself to causal analysis? Does causation always require a counterfactual? Can you sell your study by pretending that its design is better than it actually is? Well-reflected answers to these questions may lead to a revision of one’s position vis-à-vis The Causality Syndrome.
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 04:21:47 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 07:41:53 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 11:46:24 | 只看該作者
Casualties of Causality and Paths to the Future, attention to what exactly constitutes the difference between an intervention group and a control group. In a broader perspective, a too strong focus on causation may lead to a bias in the selection of topics for research. The chapter suggests three paths to the future.
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 17:34:22 | 只看該作者
Book 2022 causal studies as more important than other studies, a narrow definition of causality, and rules of thumb regarding how to make causal claims. The book argues that the present dominance of this syndrome has considerable downsides and presents a challenge to social science. The book dissects the man
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:53:24 | 只看該作者
The Causality Syndrome,f thought and controversy between the positions. However, when fast and less reflexive thinking reigns, then monism, usurpation, simplification and institutionalization lead to the present dominance of The Causality Syndrome.
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 01:59:55 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-11 04:36
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
睢宁县| 扎兰屯市| 曲阳县| 吕梁市| 二连浩特市| 榆社县| 丹阳市| 尉氏县| 县级市| 扎赉特旗| 云林县| 浮山县| 兖州市| 枝江市| 宁夏| 淄博市| 武邑县| 台中市| 青阳县| 元氏县| 梁平县| 武清区| 绍兴县| 马尔康县| 股票| 剑阁县| 万载县| 天祝| 锡林浩特市| 兴文县| 巩义市| 唐山市| 扶余县| 隆安县| 改则县| 离岛区| 原平市| 彭阳县| 花莲县| 昌都县| 陇川县|