Titlebook: Cartesian Spacetime; Descartes’ Physics a Edward Slowik Book 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002 Cartesian.Issac Newton.Ren

FAD

書目名稱Cartesian Spacetime影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Cartesian Spacetime影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Cartesian Spacetime網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Cartesian Spacetime網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Cartesian Spacetime被引頻次




書目名稱Cartesian Spacetime被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Cartesian Spacetime年度引用




書目名稱Cartesian Spacetime年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Cartesian Spacetime讀者反饋




書目名稱Cartesian Spacetime讀者反饋學科排名

burnish

暫時休息

The Structure of Spacetime Theoriesf the underlying theoretical, or structural, components of the theory of space and time presupposed in Newton’s argument. This investigation will not only determine the extent of the deficiencies, if any, in Descartes’ system, but it will also outline the necessary structural or theoretical remedies

虛度

The Cartesian Natural LawsNewton’s argument against relationalism. If we intend to construct a Cartesian science immune to Newton’s problem, however, an in-depth examination of the details of Descartes’ natural philosophy is required. Only when all the components of the Cartesian theory have been revealed and their functions

conception

Matter and Substance in the Cartesian Universenconsistencies, such as those raised in Newton’s famous argument against Descartes’ theory of space and motion. However, in order to investigate the prospects of successfully devising such a response, we will need to explore further the details of Descartes’ laws of nature. While chapter 5 will inve

改進

Quantity of Motion: The Origin and Function of the Cartesian Conservation Principleantity of motion” (size times speed), the numerical measure of “force” that, he believes, is conserved in all bodily interactions. After presenting the historical development of this concept in Descartes’ work, this chapter will explore in more detail various problematical aspects of Descartes’ cons

改進

Relational Spacetimes and Cartesian Dynamicscially when viewed within the context of his dynamics, the Cartesian natural laws. Whereas Part I dealt only with the general structure or features that a Cartesian spacetime must possess, that is, if the spacetime is to be considered a truly relational spacetime, the specific details of such spacet

arthrodesis

optional

Constructing a Cartesian Dynamics without “Fixed” Reference Frames: Collisions in the Center-of-Massanti-relationalist assault. As mentioned in the Introduction, there would seem to exist two general strategies of countering Newton’s allegations: (1) accept the contention that a fixed reference frame is incompatible with the tenets of spacetime relationalism (and attempt to provide an alternative

劇毒

Constructing a Cartesian Dynamics with “Fixed” Reference Frames: The “Kinematics of Mechanisms” Theowton’s allegations by undermining one of the key premises in its construction: that a matter-filled universe cannot allow unchanging spatial positions. In short, if some sort of fixed reference point can be located in the Cartesian plenum, then a method of tracking a moving body’s velocity over time