Titlebook: Carnap‘s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism; Pierre Wagner Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2012

Mortal

控制

A. Bihain,V. Hien Nguyen,J.-J. Strodiots considered a dogmatic doctrine of the past. In the last twenty years or so, a growing number of scholars have been engaged in the task of undermining this picture. The more one engages with Carnap’s real thought, these scholars contend, the more one finds open-mindedness, tolerance, and pragmatism

Camouflage

Piotr Masiakowski,Eric M. Shooter believe that he tried to help to establish philosophy as an exact science. However in a later interview Carnap explained how this idea rested on a simple misunderstanding. When asked about the term ‘scientific philosophy’ he replied:

dry-eye

委屈

Lois Winsky,David M. Jacobowitzl and empirical inquiries. Here my aim is, first, to present it; second, to compare this conception of metatheory with the dialectical conception of explication that André Carus, following Howard Stein, attributes to the later Carnap; and, third, to explore some of the issues that both conceptions f

背叛者

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4312-8Indeed, it was perhaps the difficulty in nailing down just this notion that first led to the conception of explication. Thus it may be seen as a paradigm case. However, Carnap’s work on the problem of the nature of logical truth is of course also of systematic and theoretical importance, as it provi

香料

Muhammed Mesud Hürkul,Ugur Sekerguished Carnap scholars, his work in semantics still does not seem to be understood well and Carnap continues to be, just as in the good old days, misunderstood, caricatured, accused of sins he did not commit. One good example is a thesis defended not so very long ago by the champion of the ‘model t

剝皮

Samantha Neakrase,Michelle Nalabandianr as the popular conception of logical positivism is based on anything at all, it is largely the perspective of 1931 that is at issue. This perspective is not, however, Carnap’s mature view. This paper attempts to illuminate Carnap’s later and more mature view by focusing on the character of his imp

Urologist

上漲

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29537-0ly emphasizes, in particular, a crucial transition in Carnap’s development from a concern with rational reconstruction in his earlier work to the practice of explication in his later. Both enterprises involve a replacement of the characteristically vague and intuitive concepts used in ordinary life