找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Care Ethics, Democratic Citizenship and the State; Petr Urban,Lizzie Ward Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under

[復制鏈接]
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 07:08:10 | 只看該作者
Finite Element Method for Interior Problems,ing to deliberate’, the chapter argues, is congruent with feminist aims and is respectful of difference yet firmly committed to truth—a commitment critical for our so-called post-truth era. The chapter concludes by considering the limits of Gadamer’s account and the close ties between listening, solidarity and loss.
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 08:48:58 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 12:24:54 | 只看該作者
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 19:32:12 | 只看該作者
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 23:20:49 | 只看該作者
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 03:41:15 | 只看該作者
Donatella Occorsio,Woula Themistoclakisle interdependence. Arguing for the latter, the discussion reimagines both cosmopolitanism and care from the perspective of mutual dependencies highlighted by the migration crisis of Indian health care workers.
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 07:09:11 | 只看該作者
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 09:37:43 | 只看該作者
Approximating Implicitly Defined Manifolds,rovides a bird-eye view of the existing proposals for a care-oriented public administration, with a focus on a recent discussion about the possibility of merging the values of care and bureaucracy in state and public sector institutions. Finally, the chapter suggests an empirically grounded care-oriented approach to governmental institutions.
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 14:33:27 | 只看該作者
Democratic Practice and ‘Caring to Deliberate’: A Gadamerian Account of Conversation and Listeninging to deliberate’, the chapter argues, is congruent with feminist aims and is respectful of difference yet firmly committed to truth—a commitment critical for our so-called post-truth era. The chapter concludes by considering the limits of Gadamer’s account and the close ties between listening, solidarity and loss.
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 17:28:50 | 只看該作者
Why the Publicly Funded Solution Is Better Equipped to Provide Democratic Care ‘For All’pending on whether we are interested in, first, particularised versus standardised solutions, in which case civil society is better able to meet ethical care demands. Or whether we are interested in equal access to care for all, in which case the state provides a better alternative than either the civil society or the market.
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-17 03:06
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
桓仁| 托里县| 罗田县| 吴堡县| 泸水县| 麻栗坡县| 甘德县| 南岸区| 栾川县| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 元谋县| 闽侯县| 海淀区| 杨浦区| 大渡口区| 石家庄市| 寿光市| 神农架林区| 滨州市| 嘉禾县| 遵义县| 贵州省| 嘉义县| 肥乡县| 泗洪县| 溆浦县| 阳山县| 南岸区| 商城县| 滕州市| 焦作市| 广饶县| 辽源市| 闻喜县| 策勒县| 宝鸡市| 德安县| 肃北| 望江县| 涿州市| 宝丰县|