找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Capacity Assessment and the Law; Problems and Solutio Kelly Purser Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Capacity assessment.

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 53722|回復(fù): 38
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:35:17 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Capacity Assessment and the Law
副標(biāo)題Problems and Solutio
編輯Kelly Purser
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/222/221364/221364.mp4
概述Suggests best practice guidelines for assessing capacity to assist with assessments.Outlines the guiding principles to help legal and medical practitioners assess capacity.Comparison of international
圖書封面Titlebook: Capacity Assessment and the Law; Problems and Solutio Kelly Purser Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Capacity assessment.
描述.This book discusses theoretical issues, standards, and professional considerations arising when legal and health practitioners undertake legal capacity assessments in the context of wills, enduring powers of attorney and advance health directives. The potential loss of cognition can erode autonomy as individuals lose the ability to make their own legally recognised decisions. This is an inescapable problem with significant legal, social, health and policy repercussions. This work synthesises and critically analyses the existing literature, including some of the best assessment models and guiding principles internationally, to generate a new methodology and understanding of what capacity assessment best practice means. This includes the impact of assessments on individual autonomy - the ideal method building upon respect for both autonomy as well as fundamental human rights. The triggers to assess capacity, who to involve in the assessment process, as well as how to conduct that assessment process are discussed. The crucial relationship between the legal and health professionals involved in assessments, including growing concerns around practitioner liability, is also explored. Thi
出版日期Book 2017
關(guān)鍵詞Capacity assessment; Competency; Substitute decision-making; Supported decision-making; Wills
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54347-5
isbn_softcover978-3-319-85374-1
isbn_ebook978-3-319-54347-5
copyrightSpringer International Publishing AG 2017
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Capacity Assessment and the Law影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Capacity Assessment and the Law影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Capacity Assessment and the Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Capacity Assessment and the Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Capacity Assessment and the Law被引頻次




書目名稱Capacity Assessment and the Law被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Capacity Assessment and the Law年度引用




書目名稱Capacity Assessment and the Law年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Capacity Assessment and the Law讀者反饋




書目名稱Capacity Assessment and the Law讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:56:08 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:57:24 | 只看該作者
T. J. Wiktor,M. P. Kieny,R. Lathef capacity can be undertaken without an exploration of the relevant ethical considerations, including the importance of trust. Some select models of assessment are then analysed. This emphasises the juxtaposition of using clinical assessment tools when they are not designed to measure legal capacity
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:30:35 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9268-3es faced when attempting to conduct clinical assessments of legal capacity within the requisite legal framework. The adequacy of the existing paradigm to assess testamentary capacity is critically explored with reference to the ‘golden rule’ utilised in the United Kingdom. Suggestions as to what to
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:05:03 | 只看該作者
New Generation of Rabies Vaccineds supported decision-making in line with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is made. Nevertheless, enduring documents, and substitute decision-making, still play a significant role in estate planning. Accordingly, evidencing the loss of decision-making capacity is also examin
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:00:31 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:09:39 | 只看該作者
Annals of Theoretical Psychologyles which should inform any satisfactory assessment paradigm. Suggestions are then made about the assessment process itself, including the role of health professionals. Ideally, input is needed from all relevant stakeholders in order to develop a best practice paradigm, and so hurdles and hindrances
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:53:42 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:54:38 | 只看該作者
The Challenges Presented by the Assessment of Legal Capacity,standings around the nature of the cognitive assessment to be conducted within the specific legal framework. This impacts not only the individual whose capacity is being assessed, but also the legal and health professionals involved in the assessments, especially as professional liability concerns g
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:49:16 | 只看該作者
Legal Capacity,f capacity can be undertaken without an exploration of the relevant ethical considerations, including the importance of trust. Some select models of assessment are then analysed. This emphasises the juxtaposition of using clinical assessment tools when they are not designed to measure legal capacity
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-20 02:57
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
汝城县| 丰原市| 苍溪县| 察哈| 从江县| 乐清市| 五家渠市| 英吉沙县| 天津市| 庆元县| 南丹县| 肇庆市| 北碚区| 江口县| 宁南县| 威信县| 来安县| 冀州市| 广河县| 万宁市| 福清市| 宜宾市| 永春县| 泾阳县| 益阳市| 怀安县| 夏邑县| 车险| 烟台市| 宾川县| 佛学| 蓝山县| 阿勒泰市| 高碑店市| 长治市| 玉林市| 黔西县| 巫溪县| 仲巴县| 新和县| 侯马市|