找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Can‘t We Make Moral Judgements?; Mary Midgley Book 1993 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 1993 moral.morality.philosop

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 教條
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 18:38:52 | 只看該作者
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 20:05:30 | 只看該作者
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 01:42:30 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-9330-3Factual statements, then, do not carry a guarantee of completeness and finality. When we understand this, we have largely got rid of the false contrast between an absolute and infallible kind of factual knowledge and a supposedly loose speculation about values. The question about value-judgements then gets much easier.
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 05:23:51 | 只看該作者
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 07:58:50 | 只看該作者
Scepticism and Liberty,For the moment, what has been said about knowledge here is designed only to show why the subject matters, and how important it is to distinguish these sceptical considerations about the possibility of knowledge from substantial moral considerations about the need to let other people alone and the value of freedom.
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 14:40:29 | 只看該作者
Why Must We Not Interfere?,Turning then to our outstanding moral question, we ask: how much does personal freedom matter, and why?
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 19:26:05 | 只看該作者
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 22:59:13 | 只看該作者
Doubts, Reasonable and Otherwise,We come back now to issues about the nature of knowledge—to the question whether moral judgement is in some sense impossible because we do not have knowledge about values.
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 01:22:17 | 只看該作者
What About Values?,Factual statements, then, do not carry a guarantee of completeness and finality. When we understand this, we have largely got rid of the false contrast between an absolute and infallible kind of factual knowledge and a supposedly loose speculation about values. The question about value-judgements then gets much easier.
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 06:37:59 | 只看該作者
Back to the Main Question,Have we answered our original question? Can’t we, after all, make moral judgements?
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-15 01:48
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
霍州市| 鹿邑县| 合作市| 西吉县| 朔州市| 西林县| 上饶县| 巫溪县| 嘉义市| 三台县| 丹棱县| 威海市| 凌源市| 伽师县| 潮安县| 太仆寺旗| 赞皇县| 稻城县| 新建县| 沙雅县| 揭阳市| 宽城| 五寨县| 潮安县| 志丹县| 兰西县| 巧家县| 盖州市| 平陆县| 宜兴市| 武定县| 清水河县| 盐亭县| 贺州市| 巫溪县| 南丹县| 乡城县| 增城市| 尖扎县| 河北省| 乳山市|