Titlebook: Cantonese Particles and Affixal Quantification; Peppina Po-lun Lee Book 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 Affixal quanti

一個(gè)攪動(dòng)不安

The Syntax-Semantics Mappings of Affixal Quantifiers and Tripartite Structures,I will argue that affixal quantifiers give a mapping mechanism distinct from that of A-quantifiers and that of D-quantifiers: while the selection of items for association is determined by the QAH as derived in ., there is no unified mapping for affixal quantifiers. When there is no focus in the sent

縮短

cumulative

滔滔不絕地講

Concluding Remarks,antifiers -. ‘open’, -. ‘a(chǎn)ll’ and -. ‘a(chǎn)dd’. What is peculiar about these verbal suffixes is that they are morphologically attached to verbs but are semantically possible to interpret with all verbal arguments. Hence, these suffixes are essentially quantificational, since it is from the suffix that t

印第安人

Haeeder Munther Noman,Mahdi Nsaif Jasimo the restrictor and the matrix: the determiner (D) as the operator, the common noun phrase (CNP), the restrictor and the verb phrase (VP), the matrix. Focus influences neither the selection nor the mapping of D-quantifiers and the insensitivity of D-quantifiers toward focus demonstrates their highl

法律的瑕疵

0924-4670 escriptive and theoretical approaches, making it an essential resource for researchers studying the nexus of syntax and semantics, as well as Cantonese itself.978-94-007-9511-2978-94-007-4387-8Series ISSN 0924-4670 Series E-ISSN 2215-0358

FRET

,The Role of Focus in Affixal Quantification – Does Quantification in Natural Language Involve One Po the restrictor and the matrix: the determiner (D) as the operator, the common noun phrase (CNP), the restrictor and the verb phrase (VP), the matrix. Focus influences neither the selection nor the mapping of D-quantifiers and the insensitivity of D-quantifiers toward focus demonstrates their highl

Dorsal-Kyphosis