Titlebook: Cancer Data For Good; A History of the Vic Thomas Kehoe Book 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte L

高原

,Post-War Recovery, Expansion, and Technological Advancement, 1945–1968,iding medical recordkeeping or it was meant to contribute to cancer science. This tension emerged in 1945?when the registry’s?first registrar and most avid proponent Robert Fowler returned from the war seeking to resume operations. But after?three years of shutdown, debate in the Council ignited?abo

recession

違抗

fluoroscopy

filicide

,Towards the Future: New Leadership and State of the Art Technology, 2011–2019,e Victorian government and the VCR was transferred to state control. Graham Giles stepped down as director. He was replaced by his long-time offsider Helen Farrugia. With the support of a new Council CEO Todd Harper, she accelerated the registry’s technological advancement and increased its utility

無辜

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77620-5 and salient to public health policy, the history of cancer registration has received little attention from historians. This oversight is partly due to cancer control scientists who, despite recognising the importance of cancer data to epidemiology, studies of treatment efficacy, and research into m

縱欲

Genistein

侵害

Lucia Rivera-Lara,Frederick A. Zeilerministration, he was new to cancer registration. Yet over his first decade in the role, he rose to international prominence in cancer control and in cancer surveillance. This chapter charts the development of Gray’s thinking about cancer registration and its consequences for the registry, from skept

竊喜