Titlebook: Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?; Jack Li Book 20021st edition Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002 Epicurus.death.is

Sinus-Node

ELATE

Diagnostiek van Neurologische AandoeningenIn this chapter, I will reject the Lucretian symmetry argument by criticising some proposals from recent philosophers. To achieve this, let me explicate the Lucretian symmetry argument first.

違抗

The Epicurean Argument,The Epicurean argument has provided the classical objection to the widely held view that death can be a harm to the person who dies. To attain the central aim of this book, first of all, I want to refute Epicurus in this chapter.

騷動

The Desire-thwarting Theory,This chapter is concerned with the questions: Is the desire-thwarting theory acceptable? If not, why? Let me outline this theory first.

oxidize

The Deprivation Theory,The deprivation theory is the most popular anti-Epicurean view.1 Silverstein calls this view the standard argument against the Epicurean view.2 In this chapter, I want to investigate whether or not this very popular anti-Epicurean view is satisfactory. To begin this task, let me first illustrate the deprivation theory.

形容詞

Intersect

The Lucretian Symmetry Argument,In this chapter, I will reject the Lucretian symmetry argument by criticising some proposals from recent philosophers. To achieve this, let me explicate the Lucretian symmetry argument first.

Communal

Ledger

輕率看法

Conclusion, him I have shown, in Chapter One, that the Epicurean argument is defective. Hence, at this point, I can at least claim that it is possible that death . be a harm to the person who dies. However, to really secure this conclusion, it is necessary to give further justification.