Titlebook: CONCUR‘93; 4th International Co Eike Best Conference proceedings 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993 Automata.Automaten.CONCUR‘93.C

clannish

書目名稱CONCUR‘93影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱CONCUR‘93影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱CONCUR‘93網絡公開度




書目名稱CONCUR‘93網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱CONCUR‘93被引頻次




書目名稱CONCUR‘93被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱CONCUR‘93年度引用




書目名稱CONCUR‘93年度引用學科排名




書目名稱CONCUR‘93讀者反饋




書目名稱CONCUR‘93讀者反饋學科排名

calamity

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-03524-0systems to asynchronous transition systems, showing that time gives a link between true concurrency and interleaving. Moreover, we can provide a complete axiomatisation of bisimulation for our algebra; a result that is often problematic in a timed setting..Another advantage of incorporating timing i

襲擊

Migratory

On the ill-timed but well-caused,systems to asynchronous transition systems, showing that time gives a link between true concurrency and interleaving. Moreover, we can provide a complete axiomatisation of bisimulation for our algebra; a result that is often problematic in a timed setting..Another advantage of incorporating timing i

Genetics

Branching time temporal logic and amorphous tree automata, .. is linear in |ψ| and the extension required for satisfiability is exponential. Based on that, we get a polynomial model checking procedure and an exponential decision procedure for CTL, both match the known lower bounds. This is the first time that a model checking algorithm for a branching-time

陳腐思想

陳腐思想

廢除

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7771-8wait for a message and it is therefore controlled by its environment. We show that the broadcast model of CBS can be interpreted in a model based on synchronous parallelism. This is demonstrated by presenting a translation to SCCS and proving that the translation is correct up to strong bisimulation equivalence.

種子

David J. Krieger,Christian J. J?ggirised on auxiliary proof systems for deciding on equalities or more general boolean identities over the expression language for data. The completeness of these proof systems are thus relative to the completeness of the auxiliary proof systems.

GROG